| University | Whitireia and WelTec |
| Subject | BUS9505 Artificial Intelligence for Business |
BUS9505 Assessment Brief
1. Course Information
Table 1: Course summary
| Course Title | BUS9505 Artificial Intelligence for Business |
| Level | 9 |
| Credit Value | 15 Credits |
| Duration | 17 weeks |
| Passing Criteria | Ākonga (students) should attempt all assessments, pass all learning outcomes and achieve a minimum of 50% overall. |
| Attendance | Students are expected to attend all lectures. Approved leave requires Programme Manager approval and supporting documentation, such as a certificate from a NZ-registered doctor, a police report, and a death certificates. Please note: the NZ Immigration has a 100% attendance criterion. You will be recorded as absent without any valid evidence. |
| Course Delivery | Lectures, tutorials, group work, project work, presentations, and self-directed learning |
| Please refer to the program handbook and the institutional website for programme guidelines and other details. | |
Table 2: Classroom, time, and delivery
| Session | Day | Time | Campus | Room |
| 1 | Monday | 1 PM to 4 PM | Petone | T311 (Computer Lab) |
Table 3: Contact details
| Name
(Role) |
Dr Shan Rahman
(Tutor) |
Sandee Beattie
(Administrator) |
Dr Cyril Peter
(Programme Manager) |
Mary-Claire Proctor
(Head of School) |
| shan.rahman@weltec.ac.nz | sandee.beattie@weltec.ac.nz | cyril.peter@weltec.ac.nz | mary.proctor@wandw.ac.nz | |
| Office | T-Block 7th Floor Petone | |||
Appointments and Meetings
Students can schedule appointments via email. Meetings can be conducted via MS-Teams or in person. Alternatively, students can consult with tutors immediately after class.
2. Course Details
2.1. Course Aims/ Objectives
To provide ākonga (students) with an understanding of how artificial intelligence (AI) can be integrated into business operations and decisionmaking processes. Students will explore the potential and impact of AI across various business functions, examine ethical and legal considerations, and implementation challenges.
2.2. Learning Outcomes
- Critically evaluate the role and impact of AI in contemporary business.
- Identify and analyse AI applications across different business functions.
- Develop strategies for integrating AI into business to drive innovation and efficiency.
- Critically assess ethical and legal implications of AI deployment in business contexts.
2.3. Indicative Content
- Historical context and evolution of AI in business
- Current trends and future prospects
- Ethical issues in AI deployment
- Data privacy and security
- Regulatory frameworks and compliance
- Change management and organisational readiness
- Skills and talent requirements
- Measuring and managing AI performance
At a level 9 course, students are expected to acquire:
- Knowledge: Possesses advanced technical and/or theoretical expertise in a discipline or practice, with a critical understanding of the fundamental principles involved.
- Skills: Analyse complex and unpredictable problems to develop solutions. Assess and implement various technological means and processes related to the specific field of work or study.
- Application: Building a sense of identification with a profession and/or discipline by applying advanced generic skills and/or specialist knowledge. Taking responsibility for maintaining the integrity of the profession or discipline.
2.4. Resources
Most of the course materials, including lecture notes, resources, reference materials, and assignments, will be available on WelTec/Whitireia Online Portal (Moodle). Students are encouraged to utilise books, journals, and other resources provided by the institution. As the subject matter is constantly changing and evolving, students should also explore emerging AI tools and related updates online.
3. Assessment Guidelines
3.1. Assessment Matrix
Various assessment methods can be used to evaluate student achievement of course aims, learning outcomes, and skills. These include group work, presentations, assignments, projects, essays, individual presentations, posters, and tests/exams.
Table 4: Assignments summary
| Assessment | Assessment Type | Weight | Due Date | Learning Outcomes |
| Assignment 1 | AI: Business Strategy (Report) | 80% | 12 May 2026 | 1, 2, 3 |
| Assignment 2 | Ethical Implications (Presentation) | 20% | Starting 18 May 2026 (tentative) | 4 |
| Total Weighting | 100% |
3.2. Grades
Table 5: Grading system
| Achievement | Description | Grade | Grade
Point |
Grade to
Mark Range |
| Excellent | Learning outcomes met. Proficient in the most difficult concepts, theories and skills. Is able to integrate concepts, theories and skills, and recognise the links and relationships between them. Is able to adapt and apply concepts, theories and skills to new situations, and to formulate and evaluate new ideas. | A+ | 9 | 90–100 |
| A | 8 | 80–89 | ||
| Good | Learning outcomes met. Is able to use and apply the fundamental theories, concepts and skills of the learning outcomes to a wide range of problems, going beyond mere replication of content knowledge or skill. Shows an understanding of key ideas, awareness of their relevance, some use of analytical skills and some originality. | B+ | 6 | 75–79 |
| B | 5 | 65–74 | ||
| Satisfactory | Learning outcomes met. Has a basic grasp of factual content, theories, concepts and issues, and/or performance of basic skills to a level that would allow continuation of study in the area or to carry out work requiring these skills. | C+ | 3 | 60–64 |
| C | 2 | 50–59 | ||
| Ungraded
Pass |
Assessment result only: competency component. | P | 1 | — |
| Not
Achieved |
Did not achieve one or more learning outcomes. | D | 0 | 0–49 |
| Ungraded
Fail |
Ungraded Fail. One or more course requirements not met. | F | 0 | — |
Table 6: Marking Guide
| ‘A’ Grade Description | ‘B’ Grade Description | ‘C’ Grade Description | ‘D’ Grade Description | |||||
| Criterion One:
Ideas and understanding |
•
• • • |
Excels in responding to assessment tasks
Interesting; demonstrates development of complex ideas Appropriately limits and defines terms. Central ideas are clearly and succinctly communicated Understands and critically evaluates supporting evidence /reference material |
•
• • • • |
A sound course, responding to assessment tasks
Attempts to define terms, not always successful Clearly states central ideas, but may have minor lapses in development Begins to acknowledge the complexity of central ideas and the possibility of other points of view Shows careful reading of supporting evidence/ reference material but may not evaluate them critically |
•
• • • |
Adequate, but less effective response to assessment tasks
Presents central ideas in general terms, occasionally depending on generalizations and/or dictionary definitions Limited exploration of other points of views Shows basic comprehension of supporting evidence /reference material with occasional lapses in understanding |
•
• • • • |
Does not respond appropriately to the assessment task
Lacks central ideas Supporting evidence /reference material misunderstood or inadequate Ineffective development of ideas Assessment too brief |
| Criterion Two:
Supporting Evidence |
•
• |
Uses citations appropriately and effectively, providing sufficient evidence
Explanations supported and justified convincingly |
•
• |
Support points using a range of relevant citations
Begins to interpret and justify the evidence, explaining connections between evidence and main ideas |
•
• • • |
Generalizations sometimes used to support points
Sometimes depends on unsupported evidence or personal experience Occasionally assumes that evidence speaks for itself and needs no application to the point being discussed Occasional lapses in logic |
•
• |
Uses irrelevant or inadequate supporting evidence /reference material throughout
Supporting evidence /reference material consistently not acknowledged |
| Criterion Three:
Organisation and coherence |
•
• • |
Uses logical structure appropriate to assessment tasks
Transitional sentences often develop and link ideas and identify their logical relations Paragraphs have topic sentences guiding the reader through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas |
•
• |
Shows a logical progression of ideas and uses transitional sentences
Some logical links may be faulty but each paragraph clearly relates to central ideas |
•
• • |
Occasionally lists ideas arranged randomly (rather than using any evident logical structure)
While each paragraph may relate to central idea, logic is not always clear Arrangement of sentences within paragraphs may occasionally lack coherence |
•
• |
Lacks organisation, paragraph coherence and uses few or inappropriate transitional sentences
Paragraphs lack topic main ideas and may not all relate to assessment tasks |
| Criterion Four:
Style |
•
• • |
Chooses words for their precise meaning and uses disciplineappropriate language
Writing style fits the assessment task Sentences are varied, yet clearly structured, focused, and succinct |
•
• |
Generally uses words and discipline appropriate language accurately and effectively
Sentences generally clear, well-structured, and focused, though some sentences may be awkward or ineffective |
•
• • |
Occasionally uses relatively vague and simple words
May use some non-academic language occasionally Sentence structure generally correct, but sentences may occasionally be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing |
•
• • |
Too vague and abstract
Overall, contains awkward or grammatically incorrect sentences Majority of sentence structure is too simple with use of non-academic language |
| Criterion Five:
Mechanics (Spelling, punctuation, grammar, referencing and formatting) |
• Almost entirely free of mechanical errors | • May contain mechanical errors, which may distract the reader but not impede understanding | • Contains several mechanical errors, which may temporarily confuse the reader but not impede the overall understanding | • Contains many mechanical errors that block the reader’s understanding and ability to see
connections between ideas |
||||
3.3. Policies and Regulations
- All assignments must be submitted electronically via Moodle by the due date/time, unless advised otherwise. Students can refer to the Student Programme Handbook for information on applying for further assessment opportunities. It is the student’s responsibility to ensure all assignments comply with the WelTec/Whitireia plagiarism policy. Please check Student guide and Taikura Quality Management System for details. Students who submit late without an approved extension are not permitted to resit/resubmit the assessment task.
- Extensions can only be granted for the following extraordinary circumstances:
- Sickness: A medical certificate must be presented to the tutor.
- Bereavement: The tutor must be informed as soon as possible. Supporting documentation may be required.
- Extenuating circumstances: These circumstances must be explained to the tutor. Supporting documentation may be required.
- Students are responsible for making their own backup copy of any work done on a computer. This backup should be updated after any significant change (at least once a day). Students must not rely on WelTec/Whitireia systems to do a backup for them.
- If you believe that your assessment has been incorrectly graded, you have the right to appeal your mark upon written request to the program manager within five (5) working days of the return of the assessment result.
- Any application must be completed on the official Reconsideration of Marks Request Form available from the campus administrator and be directed to the Programme Manager along with the reconsideration fee.
- You will be notified of the reconsidered mark, which may be unchanged, raised or lowered within (10) working days of the written request for consideration being granted.
- Feedback and results are given to students within 15 working days of the assessment date unless otherwise specified in the programme regulations.
- Assessment marks will be published via the institute’s APlus+ Student Module All marks are provisional and will be finalised at the end of the trimester.
- Teamwork is a joint effort. Please be aware that while you are working in a group, you will be graded individually. Everyone may not receive the same final mark. Make sure you contribute to the group work.
- While discussion of assignment topics is encouraged, students must not use the work of others without proper acknowledgement. All sources used must be fully cited.
- WelTec/Whitireia take a serious view of plagiarism and cheating in any form of assessment and will take appropriate steps to detect plagiarism, including using Turnitin as an electronic plagiarism detector tool.
- According to Copyright Law (http://www.copyright.co.nz/), students are not allowed to copy more than 10% or one chapter from any book /text/copyright material. You must submit assessments that clearly acknowledge the work of others.
- You are expected to demonstrate academic writing skills. Several credible guides to APA style are available on the internet.
- Plagiarism and all other forms of cheating will be treated with the utmost seriousness. The Institute reserves the right to electronically scan students’ assessments to verify originality. Penalties for plagiarism are listed in detail in the institute policies. Refer to the policies related to academic integrity, including penalties (see Taikura A4 P8 Academic Integrity).
- For more information on Enrolment, Assessment, Health and Safety, Quality, Student Services, and policies on Academic Concerns,
Student Discipline and Complaints, please refer to the student Programme Handbook and get in touch with the students’ support team.
4. Course Outline
Table 7: Course outline
| Week No. | Week Starting | Topics |
| 1 | 23 Feb | Introduction: History and evolution of AI in business |
| 2 | 2 Mar | AI Taxonomy: Machine Learning, Deep Learning, & NLP terms |
| 3 | 9 Mar | Generative AI: Current trends and prospects |
| 4 | 16 Mar | Data Privacy: Security and protection of business data |
| 5 | 23 Mar | Business Functions: AI in customer engagement |
| 6 | 30 Mar | Business Functions: Predictive analytics & decision-making |
| 7 | 6 Apr | < Easter Monday > |
| 8 | 13 Apr | Regulatory Frameworks: Global compliance and standards |
| 9 | 20 Apr | B R E A K |
| 10 | 27 Apr | < ANZAC day observed > |
| 11 | 4 May | AI Performance: Measuring and managing AI success |
| 12 | 11 May | Ethics Deep-Dive: Bias, transparency, and fairness |
| 13 | 18 May | Organisational Readiness: Change management strategies |
| 14 | 25 May | Talent & Skills: Reskilling the workforce for an AI era |
| 15 | 1 June | < King’s birthday > |
| 16 | 8 June | Innovation Strategy: Developing an integration roadmap |
| 17 | 15 June | Admin |
Every class will include three broader sections:
- Concepts, theories, and practices on topics mentioned above.
- Discussion of contemporary and latest AI tools (continuously evolving in this space)
- Societal implications
5. Assignment Details
5.1. Assignment 1
- Weighting: 80% of the overall course
- Marks: 100
- Type: Individual report
- Length: 3000 words
- Learning outcomes assessed: 1, 2, 3
Task: Identify and strategically solve a business problem using AI.
For this assessment, you will
- Diagnose a business problem (opportunity).
- Critically evaluate the application of AI to the identified business problem, business functions, data, and ethics
- Present a synthesis of AI tools you consider solving the business problem. Critically evaluate and discuss the role of the AI tool (or array of tools) you consider best to solve the problem.
- Develop (or simulate) a prototype, illustrations, and/or evidence using AI tools.
- Deliver an executive-grade report with a clear, value-driven strategy and an implementation plan.
Your report must:
- Be specific (e.g. industry, geography, product/service, customer segment).
- Have a clear business problem worth solving (e.g., churn, forecasting, pricing, supply chain, service quality, website development, fraud, taxation, HR recruiting).
- Critically evaluate the selection of AI tools in problem-solving.
- Allow measurement (define KPIs, baselines, and a plan to test impact).
- Clearly highlight what incremental business value you are adding.
- Diligently include prompts and samples wherever applicable.
- Disclose all AI assistance, including (not limited to) tool name, version, and date.
Support your discussions, explanations and evaluations with a variety of authentic resources. These resources must be referenced using the APA format.
Below are examples of a few business problems (opportunities). Students are encouraged to propose alternate innovative business problems that might suit this assessment.
- Developing an audiovisual advertisement/marketing campaign for a company.
- Customer churn prediction and next-best-action recommendations for a company. Banking/FinTech: Credit risk pre-screening with explainability and fairness
- Developing a healthcare app.
- Developing a website. Etc…
Please avoid generic business solutions.
Structure of assignment: address all requirements as stated below.
- Proper headings and sub-headings must be provided in this essay. All headings should be bold and sub-headings in italics.
- 12-point size and double-line spacing on an MS Word document.
- Number all pages.
- Keep the document formal and professional.
- Include your Name, Student ID number, Essay title, Course code and Course name on your cover page; and
- Insert your student ID number as the running header.
- Important: uses citations / in-text references/evidence appropriately and effectively, providing sufficient evidence.
- The title page, headings, sub-headings, and in- and end-text references are NOT included in the 3000-word count requirement.
Table 8: Marking Guide- Assignment 1
| Criteria | ‘A’ Grade (Excellent) | ‘B’ Grade (Good) | ‘C’ Grade (Satisfactory) | ‘D’ Grade (Not
Achieved) |
| Problem
Definition & Context (20 Marks) |
Masterfully diagnoses a complex business problem with nuanced industry context and high strategic value. | Clearly identifies a valid business problem with a relevant | Identifies a general business problem; context is present but | Fails to identify a clear or specific business problem worth solving. |
| industry/geographical context. | lacks depth or specificity. | |||
| Critical
Evaluation of the role of AI in solving the problem (25 Marks) |
Critically evaluates AI impact with profound insight; distinguishes between types of AI applicable (e.g., Generative vs.
Predictive) effectively. |
Provides a sound evaluation of AI’s role in the sector with clear, logical arguments. | Describes AI’s role generally; lacks deep critical analysis or specific links to the problem. | Mere description of AI; fails to evaluate its role or impact on the business. |
| Strategic
Integration & Innovation (25 Marks) |
Develops a visionary strategy for AI integration; includes highly specific KPIs, baselines, and a clear roadmap for ROI. | Proposes a feasible strategy for integration with clear implementation steps and relevant KPIs. | Suggests an integration plan, but KPIs or implementation steps are vague or generic. | Lacks a coherent strategy; the implementation plan is missing or unrealistic. |
| Tool Selection &
Technical Application (20 Marks) |
Exceptional selection of AI tools; provides sophisticated prompts/simulations that directly solve the problem. Provides examples/simulations/prototype | Selects appropriate tools and demonstrates their application clearly with relevant examples. | Tools are selected, but their application to the specific problem is not fully justified. | Irrelevant tools chosen or no demonstration of how they solve the problem. |
| Structure &
APA Referencing (10 Marks) |
Flawless professional report; exceeds 10 academic sources; perfect APA 7th ed. compliance. | Professional structure with clear headings; uses 10+ sources with minor APA errors. | Adequate structure: uses fewer than 10 sources or has consistent APA formatting issues. | Poorly organised; fails to use adequate academic sources or correct referencing |
5.2. Assignment 2
- Weighting: 20% of the overall course
- Marks: 100
- Type: Individual presentation (20 Minutes)
- Learning outcome assessed: 4
Prepare a presentation highlighting and critically evaluating the ethical, social, legal and regulatory impact of the strategy you proposed in assignment 1. You may raise meaningful ethical/governance considerations (E.g. privacy, fairness, transparency, safety, compliance). A formal, professional presentation should be delivered in class. Keep it interactive. You should engage the audience and motivate them to ask questions.
Tip: Think of this presentation as a “Courtroom Defence”. You have already built the “Strategy” (Assignment 1), but now you must stand before a jury (the class and the tutor) and prove that your AI system is lawful, ethical, and safe for the stakeholders (E.g. society, business, and environment). If you cannot answer the “prosecutor’s” questions (Q&A), the whole strategy may be deemed a risk.
Table 9: Marking Guide- Assignment 2
| Criteria | ‘A’ Grade (Excellent) | ‘B’ Grade (Good) | ‘C’ Grade (Satisfactory) | ‘D’ Grade (Not Achieved) |
| Ethical &
Societal Impact Analysis (30 Marks) |
Profound and nuanced assessment of bias, transparency, and fairness; identifies highly complex societal implications specific to the business context. | Provides a clear and sound assessment of ethical issues with logical arguments and relevant examples. | Identifies general ethical issues; analysis is present but lacks depth or specific application to the business case. | Fails to identify or critically assess meaningful ethical or societal impacts. |
| Legal &
Regulatory Compliance (30 Marks) |
Sophisticated analysis of global and NZ regulatory frameworks; demonstrates mastery of data privacy and security risks. | Accurate analysis of relevant legal requirements and data security standards with evidence-based claims. | Basic grasp of legal concepts; data privacy/security considerations are mentioned but not critically evaluated. | Misunderstands or ignores key legal and regulatory frameworks relevant to AI deployment. |
| Professional
Delivery & |
Exemplary professional presence: presentation is varied, succinct, and | Professional and clear delivery; maintains good eye contact and uses | Adequate delivery; mostly clear but may rely on notes | Unprofessional or confusing delivery; fails to engage the audience or meet |
| Engagement (20
Marks) |
masterfully engages the audience to participate. | discipline-appropriate language effectively. | or have minor lapses in engagement and focus. | the 20-minute time requirement. |
| Q&A and
Interactive Competency (20 Marks) |
Convincing and insightful responses to all questions; demonstrates exceptional ability to motivate and lead complex discussions. | Provides meaningful, clear answers and demonstrates a solid understanding of the assessment topic during interactions. | Responds to questions with basic factual accuracy; interaction is functional but lacks depth or original insight. | Unable to respond meaningfully to questions; demonstrates a lack of understanding of the presented material |
Human-Written BUS9505 Artificial Intelligence for Business Assignment Solutions
Hire NZ Native Experts 24/7.
Are you struggling to complete your BUS9505 Artificial Intelligence for Business assessment? Many students find it difficult to choose the right AI business problem, explain AI tools properly, or create a professional report with APA referencing and critical evaluation. But now there is no need to stress because NZ Assignment Help provides expert whitireia and welTec assignment help according to your course requirements and assessment criteria. You can also check our business assignment answers for better understanding and clarity. Order today do my assignment nz service and get a custom-written, plagiarism-free, and properly researched solution prepared specially for your assignment needs.
- 722.675 Nursing with a Mental Health Focus Assessment 1 Brief 2026 | MIT
- POPLHLTH 302 Health Services Placement Assignment Brief 2026 | UOA
- POPLHLTH 303 Health Informatics Poster Assignment 2026 | UOA
- 218.323 Measurement II Assessment Portfolio Two 2026 | Massey University
- COUN681 Solution-Focused Theory and Skills With Individuals and Groups Assessment 4 Brief 2026
- ENVPL201 Introduction to Resource Management Assessment Report 2026
- BSNS5002 Business Environments Assessment 2 Brief 2026 | Open Polytechnic
- 722.544 Introduction to Pharmacology Assessment Brief 2026 | MIT
- HWB306 Holistic Care Assessment 2 Brief 2026 | Open Polytechnic
- HLTH661 Advanced pathophysiology Individual Assessment 2026 | University of Canterbury

