| University | Auckland University of Technology (AUT) |
| Subject | HLAW701: Health Law and Policy |
HLAW701 Assessment 2 Semester 1 2026
Ensure you follow all the instructions on the Assignment page for this assessment.
Q1: 500 words
Case Study:
On a recent visit to a sexual health clinic, Nola gave the clinic her new address. The administrator wrote the address down on a post-it note but forgot to enter the new address into the clinic’s client system.
Nola’s sexually transmitted disease test results were sent to her old address. The results were opened and viewed by the people at the old address. They then informed Nola they had received them. Nola was humiliated.
Instructions:
- Applying the specific clauses of the Health Information Privacy Code (HIPC), explain whether and how the clinic is subject to the Code.
- If the clinic is subject to the Code, identify the relevant sub-rules that have been breached, linking the breaches to the relevant conduct.
- Describe the complaint process for a privacy breach, identifying the institutions involved in the process and any final remedies for Nola at the relevant tribunal. You must cite relevant sections from the legislation and use in-text cites as appropriate.
- Do not discuss CDHSCR, the HDC, or the HPDT.
Q2: 500 words
Case Study:
Jess, an oral health therapist, was convicted of criminal harassment under the Harassment Act 1997, after harassing her neighbour over several months.
She also had a conviction for drink driving from 4 years previously.
As a result of the criminal harassment conviction, Jess is charged under s100(1)(c) of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act (HPCAA) at the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal (HPDT).
Instructions
Identify two HPDT cases charged on the same ground under the HPCAA, which is 100(1)(c). The penalties in those two cases MUST be different from each other, with one case being a deregistration penalty. Explain why Jess’s civil disciplinary penalty should be in line with one of the cases you have chosen, in contrast with the other.
Ensure you provide references for the HPDT cases.
Q3: 500 words
Right 7(5) of CHDSCR allows the use of an advance directive “in accordance with the common law.” Using NZ scholarly research, critique this law to examine whether and how it could be improved.
Ensure you use at least one direct quote from one of the NZ scholarly sources, to a maximum of 50 words.
Q4: 500 words
This article is an example of how ignorance of the law by a health practitioner can result in negative outcomes for a consumer. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/542148/family-wrongly-advisedcriteria-for-assisted-dying-would-not-be-met
- In single sentences, identify your future profession and state whether it is registered or unregistered.
- Identify an example in your future profession where your ignorance of law you have learned on this course could have a negative impact on the consumer you provide services to. Do not use the example from the article or the End of Life Choice Act.
- Identify the possible legal consequences for you, including those imposed at the relevant tribunal(s). Do not discuss employment law consequences.
Research Journal
Groups navigate timelines.
Time: 2 hours
Task: Begin research for Assignment 2 Suggested Procedure:
- Please focus on ideas for a new health promotion initiative that you and your group will work on.
- Make a list of possible new initiatives.
- Make a list of essential elements to include in your new initiative.
- What te ao Māori concepts have you encountered this week? What kupu, what whakatauki?
- What sources of information have you accessed?
- What questions do you have? What further information do you need? Where will you find answers?
Feedback Mechanism: Lecturer feedback on research questions
New interdisciplinary initiative
Oral presentations are scheduled for Saturday, 23rd May and Sunday, 24th May The time of presentations will be negotiated among the groups before the day.
All Parts (A,B&C) are due 28th May @ 16::00.
Learning Outcomes:
- Critically analyse Māori health promotion practice.
- Practice effective teamwork as a basis for interprofessional learning
Suggested Procedure:
- Read the Te Pae Mahutonga Implementation Planning Guide.
- Meet with your group to hear each other’s ideas and discuss the initiative you will work on for Assignment 2.
- You are an interdisciplinary team set up to meet a need by promoting hauora Māori. You will write and present a proposal for a new health promotion initiative based on the principles of hauora Māori.
- Discuss and articulate the need your group will address.
- Utilise your collective literature review and data from Assignment 1.
- Review which research is most relevant to your group’s needs.
- Discuss solutions to the need.
- Decide on your initiative to promote hauora Māori.
- Make a list of the tasks that need to be completed to write and present your group solution, e.g. write, present, do budget, edit, images, lead kapa haka.
- Decide who will be responsible for what.
- Remember to use Te Tiriti principles for working together.
- Use a software programme (e.g., Miro, Spreadsheet) to help organise your work.
- Ask your peers for help if you are stuck.
- Work on your allocated tasks before your next group meeting.
- Write and add your group notes professionally and constructively to your research journal.
Feedback Mechanism: Peer feedback using Assignment 2 criteria
Project Proposal & Presentation of a New interdisciplinary initiative
Part A: Project Proposal & Presentation (Group) due Thursday, 28th May at 16:00 *Note presentation days below.
Part B: Individual Reflection Thursday, 28th May at 16:00
Part C: Group Member Evaluation Thursday, 28th May at 16:00
*The times of the presentations are scheduled for Saturday, 23rd May and Sunday, 24th May, and the order of the presentations will be negotiated among the groups before the day with the kaiako.
Learning Outcomes:
- Critically analyse Māori health promotion practice.
- Practice effective teamwork as a basis for interprofessional learning
Suggested Procedure:
- Meet to discuss user stories for the whanau who will access your initiative.
- Who are the people that your initiative will reach?
- How will the initiative impact them?
- Go through and ask the questions in the Te Pae Mahutonga implementation guide.
- Discuss your answers.
- Make notes and form a clear picture of your initiative.
Feedback Mechanism: Peer feedback using Assignment 2 criteria
Individual Reflection and Group Member Evaluation
Due by: Thursday, 28th May @
Time: 16.00 pm
Part B: Individual Reflection
Learning Outcomes: Present work at the appropriate academic standard Suggested Procedure:
- You may need to do some further research for your new initiative.
- Have any questions arisen from your group oral discussions?
- What te ao Māori concepts have you encountered this week? What kupu, what whakatauki?
- What sources of information have you accessed? What questions do you have? What further information do you need? Where will you find answers?
Part C. Group Member Evaluation
Answer the questions in the Evaluation (Survey) Form that is anonymous. This means your peers will not know your responses/ratings from within the form unless you tell them.
Project Prosoal & Presentation Preparation for a New interdisciplinary initiative
Task: Assignment 2
Learning Outcomes:
The learning outcomes assessed are:
- Critically discuss Māori concepts of health and Māori health promotion.
- Critically analyse Māori health promotion practice.
- Practice effective teamwork as a basis for interprofessional learning.
Suggested Procedure: Written rationale
- Begin collaboratively writing the proposal for your new initiative
- Use Google Docs, Teams, One Note, Miro or another collaborative writing tool.
- Outline your new initiative.
- Include the rationale and the data on why your new initiative is needed.
- Include the hauora Māori principles underpinning your initiative.
- Include a user story.
- Include a budget.
- Include how you will engage stakeholders.
Presentation
- Meet with your group to discuss your presentation.
- Imagine that you are presenting your new initiative for funding.
- How would you convince funders that this is a good initiative that is worth investing in?
- Be creative. You can include Google slides, pepeha, power point, whakatauki, waiata, kapa haka, oratory, stories, video, images, audio.
Feedback Mechanism: Group feedback using Assignment 2 criteria.
Individual Reflection and Group Member Evaluation
Task: Assignment 2
Learning Outcomes:
The learning outcomes assessed are:
- Critically discuss Māori concepts of health and Māori health promotion.
- Critically analyse Māori health promotion practice.
- Practice effective teamwork as a basis for interprofessional learning.
Suggested Procedure:
- Update your learning journal. How is your project progressing?
- Make notes about how are you applying Te Tiriti articles in practice: eg Kawanatanga, Tino rangatiratanga – skill of individual contribution to group presentation. Oritetanga – equity, fairness of work. Wairuatanga – Tikanga ground rules, working together to feel comfortable.
- What te ao Māori concepts have you encountered this week? What kupu, what whakatauki?
- Make notes on what sources of information you have accessed.
- You may need to do some further research for your new initiative. Are there any questions that have arisen from your group discussions?
- What questions do you have? Where will you find answers?
- You can use the responses to Questions 1-6 to collate and rate your observations of membership contributions to assist with completing the Group MEMBER Evaluation (Part C)
Feedback Mechanism: Group feedback for Assignment 2.
Project Proposal and Presentation for a New interdisciplinary initiative
Due by: Sat 23rd and Sun 24th May
Time: 9 am to 5 pm
Task: Assignment 2 Practice presentation Learning Outcomes:
The learning outcomes assessed are:
- Critically discuss Māori concepts of health and Māori health promotion.
- Critically analyse Māori health promotion practice.
- Practice effective teamwork as a basis for interprofessional learning.
Suggested Procedure:
Presentation
- Practice your presentation.
- Get together online in your group and practice your presentation with your peers.
- Present to another student group
- Ask for feedback according to the assignment criteria.
- Provide feedback to another student group using the assignment criteria.
Written proposal
- Refine your written proposal and your presentation.
- Check that your referencing is complete and accurate.
Feedback Mechanism: Peer feedback using Assignment 2 criteria
Individual Reflection (Research journal) and Group Member Evaluation
Due by: Thurs 28th May Time: 16:00.
Task: Assignment 2
Learning Outcomes:
The learning outcomes assessed are:
- Critically discuss Māori concepts of health and Māori health promotion.
- Critically analyse Māori health promotion practice.
- Practice effective teamwork as a basis for interprofessional learning.
Suggested Procedure:
- Update your research journal. How is your project progressing?
- Make notes about how are you applying Te Tiriti articles in practice: eg Kawanatanga, Tino rangatiratanga – skill of individual contribution to group presentation. Oritetanga – equity, fairness of work. Wairuatanga – Tikanga ground rules, working together to feel comfortable.
- What te ao Māori concepts have you encountered this week? What kupu, what whakatauki?
- Make notes on what sources of information you have accessed.
- You may need to do some further research for your new initiative. Are there any questions that have arisen from your group discussions?
- What questions do you have? Where will you find answers?
- You can use the responses to Questions 1-6 to collate and rate your observations of membership contributions to assist with completing the Group MEMBER Evaluation (Part C)
Project Proposal & Presentation for a New interdisciplinary initiative Assignment 2:
Due by Sat 23rd and Sun 24th May
9 am to 5 pm
Time: During the Wānanga
Time: 15 – 30 min per oral presentation in a 30 – 45 min time slot
Task: Assignment 2
Learning Outcomes:
- Critically analyse Māori health promotion practice.
- Practice effective teamwork as a basis for interprofessional learning
HLAW701 Assessment 2 Rubric
| Q1. view longer description
Written
Presentation
Feedback Mechanism: Formative feedback from others/peers/colleagues |
10 to >7.9 pts
A range Identified specific law and applied it comprehensively to the case study. Comprehensive and accurate description of the process and institutions. Clearly demonstrated engagement with legislation. |
| 7.9 to >6.5 pts
B range Mostly accurate identification of relevant law and application to case study, with some minor omissions or errors. Process and institutions are described, with minor errors or omissions. Some demonstration of engagement with legislation. 6.5 to >4.9 pts C range Some identification of relevant law, and application to facts with some omissions or inaccuracies. Process and institutions are described, with some errors or omissions. Minor demonstration of engagement with legislation. 4.9 to >0 pts D range Did not identify specific law. Limited or no application to case facts. Legal process and institutions not identified, or with significant omissions or inaccuracies. Limited to no demonstration of engagement with legislation. |
|
| Q2. view longer description | 10 to >7.9 pts
A range Identified specific law and applied it comprehensively to the case study. Comprehensive and accurate identification of outcomes. Accurate analysis of the role of criminal and civil law. Clearly demonstrated engagement with legislation and/or case law. 7.9 to >6.5 pts B range |
| Mostly accurate identification of relevant law, application to facts, and outcomes identified, with minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some analysis of the role of criminal and civil law. Some demonstration of engagement with legislation and/or case law.
6.5 to >4.9 pts C range Some identification of relevant law, application to facts, and outcomes identified, with some omissions or inaccuracies. Some analysis of the role of criminal and civil law with some omissions or inaccuracies. Minor demonstration of engagement with legislation and/or case law. 4.9 to >0 pts D range Incorrect law identified. Limited or no application to facts and outcomes. Insufficient or incorrect analysis of the role of criminal and civil law. Insufficient demonstration of engagement with legislation and/or case law. |
|
| Q3. view longer description | 10 to >7.9 pts
A range Excellent, robust, independent critique of cases, legislation, or policy relating to consumers’ rights based on scholarly research is demonstrated. 7.9 to >6.5 pts B range Sound critique of cases, legislation, or policy relating to consumers’ rights with some reference to scholarly research is demonstrated. |
| 6.5 to >4.9 pts
C range Some evidence of critique of cases, legislation, or policy based on scholarly research is provided. 4.9 to >0 pts D range Insufficient critique of cases, legislation, or policy relating to consumers’ rights with insufficient reference to scholarly research is provided. |
|
| Q4. view longer description | 10 to >7.9 pts
A range Comprehensive and accurate identification and application of cases, legislation, or policy to current or future health care practice. Clear demonstration of engagement with cases, legislation, or policy. 7.9 to >6.5 pts B range Mostly accurate identification and application of cases, legislation, or policy to current or future health care practice. Some minor inaccuracies or omissions. Some demonstration of engagement with cases, legislation, or policy. 6.5 to >4.9 pts C range Some accurate identification and application of cases, legislation, or policy to current or future health care practice. Some inaccuracies or omissions. Limited |
| demonstration of engagement with cases, legislation, or policy.
4.9 to >0 pts D range Insufficient identification and application of cases, legislation, or policy to current or future health care practice. Clear inaccuracies or omissions. Insufficient demonstration of engagement with cases, legislation, or policy. |
|
| References, sources, academic standard.
view longer description |
10 to >7.9 pts
A range All reference requirements are met: all sources are relevant, credible, locatable and accurately referenced. In-text citations are fully integrated into writing and support statements. All instructions followed. Comprehensive evidence of meeting academic standards expectations relating to: sentence and paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Answer follows a logical sequence. 7.9 to >6.5 pts B range Some reference requirements are not met. Most sources are relevant, credible, or locatable. Most referencing is accurate. In-text citations are mostly integrated into writing and support statements. Some instructions not followed. Sound evidence of meeting academic standards expectations relating to: sentence and paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Mostly logical sequence. |
| 6.5 to >4.9 pts
C range Several reference requirements are not met. Not enough sources are relevant, credible, or locatable, or poorly referenced. Limited integration of in-text citations into writing, with some missing. Many instructions not followed. Limited evidence of meeting academic standards expectations relating to: sentence and paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Structure is occasionally unclear. 4.9 to >0 pts D range Reference requirements are not met. Sources are not relevant, credible, or locatable. Not accurately referenced. In-text citation missing or incorrectly applied. Instructions not followed. No/insufficient evidence of meeting academic standards expectations relating to: sentence and paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Answer does not follow a logical sequence. |
Human-Written HLAW701 Health Law and Policy Assignment Solutions
Hire NZ Native Experts 24/7.
Feeling overwhelmed with your HLAW701 Health Law and Policy Assessment 2? Many AUT students struggle when they have to apply NZ health legislation, analyse tribunal cases, discuss privacy breaches, and critically evaluate legal policies within strict word limits. If you are also facing difficulty with legal analysis or reflective writing, NZ Assignment Help offers reliable law assignment help tailored to your university assessment criteria. You can also explore our AUT assignment samples to better understand structure, case application, and referencing style. Order case study writing help and get a plagiarism-free, custom-written solution prepared specially for your coursework requirements.
- 218.730 Construction Project Management Assignment 2 Brief 2026 | Massey University
- BUS9505 Artificial Intelligence for Business Assessment Brief Trimester 1, 2026
- 722.675 Nursing with a Mental Health Focus Assessment 1 Brief 2026 | MIT
- POPLHLTH 302 Health Services Placement Assignment Brief 2026 | UOA
- POPLHLTH 303 Health Informatics Poster Assignment 2026 | UOA
- 218.323 Measurement II Assessment Portfolio Two 2026 | Massey University
- COUN681 Solution-Focused Theory and Skills With Individuals and Groups Assessment 4 Brief 2026
- ENVPL201 Introduction to Resource Management Assessment Report 2026
- BSNS5002 Business Environments Assessment 2 Brief 2026 | Open Polytechnic
- 722.544 Introduction to Pharmacology Assessment Brief 2026 | MIT

