| University | Auckland Institute Of Studies (AIS) |
| Subject | MGMT902: Enterprise and Information Systems |
MGMT902 Assignment 2: Information Security, Risk Management and ICT Strategy
| Course | MGMT902 Enterprise and Information Systems |
| Provider | Auckland Institute of Studies (AIS), New Zealand |
| Level | Postgraduate (Masters) |
| Assessment | Assignment 2: Individual Report |
| Marks | Part a 30, Part b 30, Part c 40 |
| Length | Approx. 3,000 words |
| Referencing | APA |
This MGMT902 report asks postgraduate students to critically evaluate how one organisation operating in New Zealand or Australia governs its cyber security and information risk. Students analyse the threat landscape and regulatory duties, benchmark existing controls against New Zealand, Australian and international frameworks, design an ICT strategy that fits the business strategy, and assess the ethical, social and cross-border effects of the organisation’s technology use.
Assessment Overview
Critically evaluate how an organisation operating in New Zealand or Australia governs its cyber security and information risk, and benchmark that approach against the frameworks and standards applied in New Zealand and Australia. Analyse the organisation’s threat landscape and regulatory obligations, evaluate the effectiveness of its existing security measures against recognised frameworks, and assess the broader ethical, social and cross-border implications of its ICT initiatives. You may select an organisation you have previously studied, provided it operates in New Zealand or Australia and sufficient publicly available information exists.
Report Question
How effectively can a comprehensive approach to information security and risk management apply New Zealand and Australian cyber security frameworks and standards to govern the technical, operational, ethical and social challenges of ICT adoption at a company of your choice, and what can be learned from relevant international equivalents?
a. Cyber Security Threats, Risk Management and Process Improvement (30 Marks)
- Critically analyse the prevalent cyber security threats facing the company, including data breaches, ransomware and extortion, supply chain compromise and social engineering.
- Develop a tailored risk management framework by critically applying relevant New Zealand and Australian cyber security frameworks, standards and regulatory requirements.
- Evaluate the implications of the identified risks for key ICT-enabled business processes and determine major opportunities to improve process performance, resilience and security.
- Formulate and justify improvement initiatives and establish measures for evaluating their effectiveness.
Relevant instruments may include the New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM), the Protective Security Requirements (PSR), the Privacy Act 2020 including the notifiable privacy breach scheme and IPP 3A, the ACSC Essential Eight and Information Security Manual, the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 and the Cyber Security Act 2024.
b. Security Performance, Innovation and ICT Strategy Alignment (30 Marks)
- Critically evaluate the effectiveness of existing information security measures by benchmarking current practices against New Zealand, Australian and international frameworks and standards.
- Identify material gaps in existing security and ICT-enabled processes and formulate evidence-based enhancements.
- Assess opportunities for technological and process innovation, critically evaluating their organisational and commercial value, implementation requirements, risks and contribution to sustained performance.
- Formulate a systematic process for developing or revising the organisation’s ICT strategy, and critically compare it with the operational strategy, organisational strategy and wider business objectives, justifying how information systems, cyber security and innovation initiatives should be prioritised and aligned.
The comparative analysis may draw on the UK NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework (CAF) and Cyber Essentials, the NIS Regulations 2018 and the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, the EU NIS2 Directive, the GDPR, the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), the Cyber Resilience Act and ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
c. Ethical and Social Implications, Stakeholder Communication and Strategic Implementation (40 Marks)
- Critically evaluate the ethical and social implications of widespread ICT adoption within the company, including data privacy, data sovereignty, cross-border data transfer, algorithmic bias and the digital divide.
- Analyse the broader implications of ICT adoption for societal domains such as employment, education and healthcare that are materially affected by the organisation’s activities.
- Develop and justify strategies that promote ethical ICT practices, mitigate social inequalities and strengthen responsible ICT governance.
- Engage with internal IT specialists and business managers on the identified risks, ethical issues, process improvements and strategic initiatives; synthesise their perspectives and critically evaluate how stakeholder input shaped the final analysis, priorities and recommendations.
- Formulate practical, evidence-based recommendations for implementing, governing and sustaining the proposed ICT, information security and process improvements, showing how they support operational priorities, organisational strategy and longer-term objectives.
Need Expert Help with Your MGMT902 Cyber Security Report?
Hire NZ Native Experts 24/7.
MGMT902 Assignment 2 gives 40 of its 100 marks to the ethics, stakeholder and implementation section, yet many students spend most of their words listing threats. Choose a New Zealand or Australian organisation with enough public data, such as a bank, telco or health provider that has reported a breach, and tie every risk to a named instrument: NZISM and the PSR, the Privacy Act 2020 notifiable breach scheme and IPP 3A, or the ACSC Essential Eight and SOCI Act. Part b then needs a real gap analysis against ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and international benchmarks such as NIS2, DORA or the UK CAF, not a description of each framework. Our information systems management assignment help can guide your framework mapping and APA referencing. You can also browse more Auckland Institute of Studies assignment briefs, or compare the MBI800 strategic information systems planning brief and the BSYS702 cyber security and risk management assignment.
- Managing for Sustainability Assessment 1 Report and Academic Poster 2026 | Otago Polytechnic
- SCIE707 Research Project Proposal and Cultural Safety & Engagement Statement Assessment 2026 | AUT
- CA ANZ Tax (NZ) Assessment 1 Case Study Term 4 2026: Hume & Hearth Ceramics Limited
- BILD 361 Project Management Assessment 2, 2026: BIM Residential Project Management Plan | VUW
- SARC 321 Construction Assignment 3 2026: Envelope, Gantt Chart and Site Logistics Plan | Victoria University of Wellington
- LAWCOMM 782 Trade Mark Practice Letter of Advice 2026 | University of Auckland
- LAWCOMM 795 Copyright and Design Final Assessment 2026 | University of Auckland
- BSNS5202 Advanced Business Information Assessment 3, 2026 | Open Polytechnic
- BSNS5203 Applied Business Technologies Assessment 2, 2026 | Open Polytechnic
- CONS7822 Industry Project Part 2 Assessment 4 – Final Report 2026

