Avail 15% off on First assignment order NAH_FIRST_15%

Logo
University Massey University (MU)
Subject 218.323 Measurement II

218323 Assessment Portfolio One

General Instructions

  1. This is a group assignment. Your group should contain a maximum of 4 students. Should you choose, you do have the option to work individually. If you work individually, it should be presented to the same quality expected from a group.
  2. This PORTFOLIO ONE contains ONE question.
  3. Total marks for PORTFOLIO ONE: 100 marks
  4. Total course weightage and contribution of the assessment component = 40% and covers learning outcomes 1 and 2
  5. NO HARD COPY SUBMISSION IS REQUIRED
  6. Online submission on Stream: COMPULSORY.
  7. Late assignments will be penalised as per the course guide and the school’s policy.
  8. You must include your names and IDs, the course number, the course title and the names of the course teaching team on the cover page.
  9. You are only allowed to submit PDF and Costx education version files on Stream (Marks will be based upon the PDF submission only).
  10. Please read and consider all documents in the assessment folder.
  11. Include all stream communications on clarifications about the project / assessment that was used for preparing your assessment in query sheets.
  12. Covered learning outcomes
    a. Use industry-standard software to measure building quantities according to the Standard Method of Measurement.
    b. Prepare Bills of Quantities using industry-standard software

Portfolio One: 100 Marks

Question 1

Part 1

The client for Project GONDOR has decided to use a Lump Sum pricing method for the contract. Your company has been selected as one of the bidders for this project. The client requires a detailed SOQ developed to the highest industry standards, adhering to ANZSMM 2022, with take-off references for post-contract needs.

Tasks to be Measured by Your Team

Your manager has instructed your team to measure the following items for Levels 1 and 2 of the IC building and include all Notices for Tenderers (NTT):

  1. Doors
  2. Windows and façade systems
  3. Hardware
  4. Applied finishes, render and textured finishes for walls
  5. Painting for walls
  6. Joinery

Notices for Tenderers (NTT) – 1

  1. Increase the floor slabs’ level on levels 2 and 3 by a certain amount in each level and maintain the distance between the ceilings, attached floor, or roof slab at each level.
    a. This includes changing level 2 R.L. 46250 to R.L. 47250
    b. This includes changing level 3 R.L. 50650 to R.L. 52650

Part 2

The client wants to understand how the contractor calculates their rate so that any further variations can be easily processed, transparently. Therefore, the client wants contractors to provide unit rates as self-performed work for all items related to the seminar room 3 door, and the attached wall, as measured in Part 1 (level 2, grid 1 – 1b/, A-B) (refer to the highlighted area). Each rate should include a detailed breakdown of all resources with a clear rationale for rates and productivity constants, sources of data, and be priced according to ANZSMM 2022, suitable for New Zealand.

The client requires the following:

  1. Accurate Measurement of Items: Measure all items meticulously to ensure precise project quantities using the CostX education version and ANZSMM 2022.
  2. Bills of Quantities: Provide a detailed Bill of Quantities, supported by clear documentation and explanations of the quantity calculation methods.
  3. Documentation: Submit all documents suitable for industry practice in PDF format, clearly referencing how the quantities were developed.

Assessment Instructions 

  • Some drawings are not to scale. You can use drawings and dimensions from the detail drawings to measure. If there are no dimensions shown on the drawings, then develop an appropriate scale for measurement.
  • The accuracy of descriptions accounts for a considerable part of the final mark.
  • You can choose to use Costx or other software to prepare the document. However, your submission should follow examples provided in this document. You are required to show how you came up with the quantities where necessary.
  • Consider how the BOQ should look in industry practice and prepare accordingly.
  • You should include the following files in your submission (refer to the file generation steps mentioned below) o One PDF document which includes

Part 1                      

  • Front page (example 1)
  • General and specific preamble notes for each section
  • BOQ summary (refer to example 2)
  • Detailed calculations of each item (refer to example 3)
  • Drawings with dimensions take off details
  • RFI sheet / Query sheet – (refer to example 4)

Part 2

  • Rate breakdown (example 6)
  • Peer review report (refer to example 5) (you can choose to submit this individually)
  • Generative AI use statements from each student (attached at the end)

[100 marks]

Marks Breakdown

Assignment & Marking criteria

Portfolio 1 Marks
Part 1

a.

 

b.

c.

 

Part 2

 

1.  Peer r each

2.  G

i.

ii.

for the notes i.

ii. iii. iv.

v.

vi.

Correc casting schedu

SoQ fo

i.

ii. iii. iv.

v. vi.

i.

ii. iii.

eview re student

Preparation of BOQ with supportive documentation suitable for industry practice with clear documentation.

Presentation of each section (6)

Coverage of all documentation, including required content (14)

Correct descriptions and appropriate headings / sub-headings measured items including generic & specific preamble

Doors

Windows and façade systems

Hardware

Applied finishes, render and textured finishes for walls

Painting for walls

Joinery t quantities for the measured items, including side, entry of measures, and quantity referencing. The le of quantities for the trades is presented in the correct

rmat.

Doors

Windows and façade systems

Hardware

Applied finishes, render and textured finishes for walls

Painting for walls

Joinery

Preparation & Documentation

Descriptions & Headings

Quantities & Accuracy port with Student name, ID, Work section completed by

enerative AI use statement.

 

20

 

3

4

3

7

6

3

 

 

 

 

3

6

3

10

8

3

 

 

6

6

3

 

5

 

1

GRAND TOTAL  100

Marking Rubric

Part 1

Criteria Excellent (80100%) Good (60-79%) Satisfactory (4059%) Poor (<40%) Marks
A. Preparation

&

Documentation

Professional presentation. All sections present. Supportive docs (query sheets, take-off lists) are perfectly organized.

Queries are clear, most assumptions sound.

Logical presentation. Most sections present. Supportive documentation is organized but may have minor omissions. Queries and assumptions are mostly clear. Basic presentation. Some sections or required documentation are missing. Organization is loose. Queries or assumptions are vague. Disorganized or incomplete presentation. Missing major sections or supportive documentation. Assumptions are unclear or missing. / 20
B. Descriptions & Headings Precise technical terminology. Headings follow SMM exactly. Descriptions are comprehensive, following SMM and leave no room for ambiguity. All items are properly covered. Good use of technical terminology. Headings follow SMM with only minor errors. Descriptions are clear with minimal ambiguity. Most items are well covered. Some technical terms used incorrectly.

Headings are inconsistent. Descriptions are vague or missing key details. Some items omitted.

Non-technical or incorrect terminology. Headings do

not follow

SMM.

Descriptions are ambiguous, incomplete, or missing.

/ 28
C. Quantities & Accuracy Quantities are accurate. Takingoff methods are mostly accurate when applied properly.

Calculations are good. All items are properly covered.

Quantities are largely accurate with very minor

errors. Taking-off methods are sound. Calculations contain only minor mathematical slips.

Quantities show several inaccuracies. Taking-off methods are inconsistent. Calculations have

multiple mathematical errors.

Significant quantity inaccuracies. Taking-off methods are fundamentally flawed. Calculations are mathematically unreliable. / 46

Part 2

Criteria Excellent (80– 100%) Good (60– 79%) Satisfactory (40–59%) Poor (<40%) Marks
Resource

Breakdown

(LMPO)

Comprehensive breakdown of resources. Clear distinction

between each resource. Flawless

application of

measurement rules from

ANZSMM 2018.

Includes all items deemed to be included.

Clear distinction between resources. Application of ANZSMM rules

is mostly accurate, with only minor omissions of items deemed to be included.

Resources are included, but the coverage is poor and poorly defined. Follows general measurement

principles but misses several specific

ANZSMM 2022 requirements.

Fails to provide a clear resource split. Significant items are missing. Does not follow

ANZSMM

measurement units.

/6
Productivity

& Waste

Logic

Realistic NZ productivity constants (manhours), data sources, waste factors, and calculation logic. Clearly mentions and justifies the rationale for each choice. Uses realistic NZ constants and waste factors.

Provides a rationale for choices, though it may lack specific depth regarding site constraints.

Uses generic constants and waste. Rationale is present but lacks professional justification or specific connection to the context. Productivity constants are unrealistic or missing. No

justification for waste factors. Fails to cite data sources or uses a non-NZ context.

/6
Calculation & Logic Mathematical accuracy throughout. Clear Logical link from the resource buildup to the final unit rate. Strong logical link from resources to the final rate. Contains 1–2 minor mathematical slips. Calculations are generally correct, but the

logical link

between the breakdown and

the final unit rate is cluttered or difficult to audit.

Significant mathematical errors. No clear

logical link

between the resource costs and the final bill rate provided.

/3

Late Submission & Academic Integrity

a. Plagiarism: Plagiarism is a very serious offense. DO NOT PLAGIARISE. Read the rules here: https://owll.massey.ac.nz/referencing/plagiarism.php.

b. Late submission: A penalty of 3 marks will be deducted for each calendar day (including weekends and public holidays) or a part of a day an assignment is submitted late after the Stream deadline. Assignments submitted more than 7 calendar days after the Stream deadline will not be marked and will get a mark of 0.

c. Extension of time: An extension may only be granted by the course coordinator based on the circumstance.

Get expert help for 218323 measurement II assessment portfolio one

Hire NZ Native Experts 24/7.

Get Help By Expert

Many students find 218323 measurement II assessment portfolio one difficult because the project requires detailed quantity take-offs, BOQ preparation, CostX software usage, and ANZSMM 2022 measurement standards at professional industry level. Learners often struggle while preparing accurate descriptions, quantity references, rate breakdowns, façade measurements, and supporting documentation in the correct format. If you are facing similar issues, you can get university assignment help from NZ Assignment Help. Our experts provide customised massey assignment help according to course guidelines. You can also check our 218323 portfolio two to understand how professional estimation and measurement assignments are properly prepared.

Answer

UP TO 15 % DISCOUNT

Get Your Assignment Completed At Lower Prices

Plagiarism Free Solutions
100% Original Work
24*7 Online Assistance
Native PhD Experts
Hire a Writer Now

Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now! Download Our App Now!