For information and reference only – not to be submitted as your own work. This model extract shows one way to approach the brief. Your course runs originality checks, and your worksheets must be your own creations. Use this page to understand the standard, then write your own answer.
This sample follows the structure of a TEFL Level 3 Assignment B brief (online TEFL course). It shows a model extract for each step. You can browse similar tasks in our solved assignment questions library, and the reasoning behind every choice is in our full Assignment B guide.
Step 1: Lesson plan review (model extract)
Each improvement follows the same pattern: the issue, why it is an issue, what I would change and why it helps. Concept-checking questions are used as recommended by Darn and White (n.d.), and the staging follows a standard present–practise–produce sequence (Scrivener, 2011).
| Stage | Improvement 1 | Improvement 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Warmer | Issue: the warmer lasts 15 minutes. Why: a quarter of a 60-minute lesson is lost before the topic is even introduced, and young learners lose focus. Change: cut it to 5 minutes. Benefit: more time for practice, which is where learners actually use the language. | Issue: learners “write on the board” and then sit and listen in silence while the teacher talks about their own life. Why: this is not possible in an online room, and long teacher talk reduces learner talking time. Change: show two photos of a toy and a game on screen share and ask learners to type in the chat box which one they liked when they were small. Benefit: everyone takes part at once, and the context is set without the target grammar. |
| Presentation | Issue: the form is written on the board without eliciting it, and no concept-checking questions are asked. Why: learners may copy the form without understanding that the action is finished. Change: elicit the form from the Tim sentences, then ask CCQs such as “Does Tim play the piano now?” (No) and “Did he play it before?” (Yes). Benefit: the teacher can see whether the meaning is clear before practice. | Issue: the anticipated problem with hearing ‘use to’ and ‘used to’ is not addressed in the presentation. Why: the /juːstə/ sound is hard to hear. Change: model the sentence, highlight the pronunciation on a slide and drill chorally, then individually with named learners unmuting. Benefit: learners hear and produce the natural form. |
| Controlled practice | Issue: a role play is used here, but the plan’s own objectives say accuracy practice should be a worksheet. Why: a free role play is too open for learners who met the form ten minutes ago. Change: swap it with the gap-fill from the freer stage. Benefit: learners practise accurately before they speak freely. | Issue: the interaction is S-S, but no online set-up is described. Why: in a video lesson pairs need a space to work. Change: share the gap-fill with file share, let learners do it alone, then check answers in pairs in breakout rooms. Benefit: peer checking builds confidence before whole-class feedback. |
The freer practice and plenary stages follow the same pattern: move the role play into freer practice with clear role cards and breakout rooms, and replace the lecture in the plenary with a short learner-led review, for example a quick quiz or each learner typing one true sentence about themselves.
Buy High-Quality Essays & Assignment Writing As
Per Particular University, High School Or College By NZ Writers
300+
PhD Writers
4.9/ 5 ratings
From Students
70 +
Subject Covered
10+
Years Of Experience
Step 2: Two online activities (model extract)
Activity 1 – Reading comprehension stage
| Stage | Stage aim | Timing | Interaction | Teacher activity | Student activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reading comprehension stage | To check understanding of the text | 15 | T-S, S, S-S, T-S | Shares the fact sheet with screen share and the worksheet with file share. Gives short instructions and checks them with two ICQs (“Do you work alone first?” “How many minutes?”). Sets 7 minutes. Opens breakout rooms in pairs for 3 minutes to compare answers. Brings learners back and runs feedback with a short quiz on an online tool such as Kahoot, then confirms answers in the chat box. | Read the text and answer the questions alone. Compare answers with a partner in a breakout room. Answer the quiz and check their worksheet. |
Activity 2 – Follow-on speaking stage
| Stage | Stage aim | Timing | Interaction | Teacher activity | Student activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-on speaking stage | To develop fluency on the topic of travel | 15 | T-S, S-S, S-T | Shares the speaking worksheet on screen and models one prompt with a strong learner. Puts learners in breakout rooms of two or three for 9 minutes and visits each room to listen, noting language for later rather than correcting. Brings everyone back and asks each pair to share one interesting answer. | Take turns asking and answering the prompts. Choose a “dream trip” together. Share one idea with the class. |
Materials (model worksheets)
Both worksheets below are original and generic. The reading questions are written as a pattern you can apply to the animal fact sheet your course provides; check every answer against your own copy of the text.
Worksheet 1 – Animal fact sheet: reading questions
| No. | Question | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What is the name of the animal? Write one word. | Short answer |
| 2 | Where does the animal live? Circle: a) in the sea b) in the forest c) in the desert | Multiple choice |
| 3 | The animal eats meat. True or false? | True / false |
| 4 | How big is the animal? Write a number. | Short answer |
| 5 | How long can the animal live? Circle: a) about 5 years b) about 20 years c) about 50 years | Multiple choice |
| 6 | The animal lives in a big group. True or false? | True / false |
| 7 | Write one interesting fact about the animal from the text. | Short answer |
| 8 | Is the animal in danger? Why? Write one sentence. | Short answer |
Teacher note: replace the options in questions 2 and 5 with details from your text so that one option is correct.
Worksheet 2 – Let’s talk about travel: speaking prompts
| No. | Prompt |
|---|---|
| 1 | Which country from the video do you want to visit? Why? |
| 2 | I want to go to ___ because ___ . |
| 3 | What can you see or do in that country? |
| 4 | How do you want to travel there – by plane, boat or train? |
| 5 | What food do you want to try? |
| 6 | Who do you want to travel with? |
| 7 | What three things do you put in your bag? |
| 8 | Together, plan your dream trip: Where? When? For how long? |
Delaying correction until after the speaking task keeps the focus on fluency rather than accuracy (Harmer, 2015). The prompts use present simple and “want to”, which fits the A2 descriptors for simple exchanges about familiar topics (Council of Europe, 2020).
Step 3: Running dictation adaptation (model extract, about 300 words)
Changes to the activity
Running dictation usually has a “runner” who reads a text on the wall and races back to a writer (Quah, 2013). With a learner who uses a wheelchair, racing creates a collision risk and can exclude them. I would change the rule from running to walking and score accuracy rather than speed. I would clear bags and chairs to make wide routes and keep the distance short. Every learner would take a turn as reader, runner and writer, so nobody is given a special role that singles them out.
Changes to the materials
I would fix the text sheets at seated eye level, or place them flat on a desk instead of high on a wall. The font would be large and clear, and the sheets taped down firmly so they do not fall or need reaching for. Each group would have its own copy to avoid crowding at one point.
Benefits for the students
These changes lower the risk of accidents for everyone and let the learner using a wheelchair take full part on equal terms. Scoring for accuracy also helps learners who are less confident, because careful spelling matters more than speed.
This extract is shortened. A full answer would link each change more closely to the course unit on adapting resources.
In quest for a professional assignment help?
Flexible rates compatible with everyone’s budget
About the expert
Reviewed by Dr. Hannah Wilson, Education & Social Sciences Coursework Specialist, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Her profile covers education and social sciences coursework, including critical reflection, theoretical discussion and academic literature analysis.
Related support: English assignment help and diploma and certificate assignment support.
References
Council of Europe. 2020. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment – Companion Volume. Council of Europe. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/16809ea0d4 [Accessed: 20 October 2026]
Darn, S. and White, I. n.d. Checking understanding. TeachingEnglish – British Council. Available at: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/professional-development/teachers/managing-lesson/checking-understanding [Accessed: 20 October 2026]
Harmer, J. 2015. The Practice of English Language Teaching. 5th edn. Harlow: Pearson.
Quah, S.-H. 2013. Running Dictation. TESOL International Association. Available at: https://www.tesol.org/resource-center/running-dictation/ [Accessed: 20 October 2026]
Scrivener, J. 2011. Learning Teaching: The Essential Guide to English Language Teaching. 3rd edn. Oxford: Macmillan Education.
