Avail 15% off on First assignment order NAH_FIRST_15%

Logo
University Victoria University of Wellington (VUW)
Subject Health Leadership and management

Health Leadership and management – Case review and management plan

Assignment Name: Case review and management plan
Length: 2500-word limit
Weighting: This assignment is worth 50% of your final grade.

In this assignment you will undertake a case review of a leadership or management challenge in your own workplace or in the health sector. CHOOSE ONE of the options below

Option 1. A health leadership or management challenge in your own workplace or in the health sector.

OR Option 2. A health leadership and management challenge from the list below:

  • addressing staff shortages
  • promoting health equity
  • maintaining cybersecurity
  • managing burnout
  • maintaining quality and safety

Task

  1. Undertake a SWOT analysis of the factors contributing to your chosen challenge

  2. Analyse the SWOT for leadership and management implications

  3. Develop a plan to:
    a. manage the threats and weaknesses
    b. consider the financial and budgeting consequences
    c. address the human resource implications.

Throughout your assignment you will demonstrate your scholarly approach synthesising literature to provide evidence to underpin your argument. This assignment addresses course learning objectives: 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Stuck! Do not Know Assessment Answers?

Hire NZ Native Experts 24/7.

Assignment 2 Rubric

Criteria Ratings         Points
Description of significant leadership or management challenge

Criterion long description

10%

 

10 to >7.9 pts

Excellent performance 100% – 80%

Significant Leadership or management challenge clearly and comprehensively described.

7.9 to >6.4 pts

Good Performance 79-65%

Good description of significant leadership or management challenge

6.4 to >4.9 pts

Satisfactory performance 64 – 50%

Significant leadership or management challenge briefly described

4.9 to >0 pts

Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0%

Challenge description inaccurate or lacking key information, and failing to focus on important aspects for leadership response

  / 10 pts
SWOT analysis of key issues

 

 

Criterion long description

20%

 

20 to >15.9 pts

Excellent performance 100% – 80%

Thorough and insightful analysis of the key issues arising from the challenge

15.9 to >13 pts

Good Performance 79-65%

Good clear analysis of key issues arising from the challenge

13 to >9.9 pts

Satisfactory Performance 64-50%

Analysis is adequate with some key issues identified from the challenge

9.9 to >0 pts

Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0%

Analysis unclear or illogical, incomplete, does not reflect key issues apparent in the challenge

  / 20 pts
Analysis of leadership and/or management implications

 

Criterion long description

25%

 

25 to >19.9 pts

Excellent Performance 100% – 80%

Insightful analysis of the implications for leaders and/or managers, showing awareness of priorities and risks

19.9 to >16 pts

Good Performance 79-65%

Clear description of the implications for leadership and/or management

16 to >12.4 pts

Satisfactory Performance 64-50%

Adequate description of the implications for health leadership and/or management

12.4 to >0 pts

Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0%

Analysis unclear or illogical, incomplete, does not reflect positioning at management and leadership level

  / 25 pts
Management plan

 

 

Criterion long description

25%

 

25 to >19.9 pts

Excellent Performance 100% – 80%

Thorough and comprehensive plan showing insight in its structure, management of contingencies and risks

19.9 to >16 pts

Good Performance 79-65%

Logical and complete plan responding to the key issues and important implications

16 to >12.4 pts

Satisfactory Performance 64-50%

Adequate plan responding to some leadership and management implications

12.4 to >0 pts

Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0%

Incomplete or illogical plan, missing key issues and likely challenges – lacks substance

  / 25 pts
Scholarly writing – Develops scholarly argument, and logical structure for analysis. Well organised paragraphs.

 

Criterion long description

10%

 

 

10 to >7.9 pts

Excellent Performance 100% – 80%

Excellent quality of argument, presented with a clear logical flow.

7.9 to >6.4 pts

Good Performance 79-65%

Good clarity of writing with a sound argument and logical flow.

6.4 to >4.9 pts

Satisfactory Performance 64-50%

The argument is adequate but lacks some clarity or logical flow

4.9 to >0 pts

Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0%

Unclear argument that lacks logical flow.

  / 10 pts
Presentation – Sources are properly acknowledged. Accurate and consistent spelling, grammar, and referencing. Within word limit.

 

Criterion long description

10%

 

10 to >7.9 pts

Excellent Performance 100% – 80%

Extensive range of literature, chosen from high quality sources, correctly represented, and cited, used effectively to support arguments made. No spelling, grammatical or referencing errors.

7.9 to >6.4 pts

Good Performance 79-65%

Number of references covering key points with some attempt to draw on published experiences in similar contexts. Some minor grammatical, spelling or referencing errors noted.

6.4 to >4.9 pts

Satisfactory Performance 64-50%

Some references are used to support the key points. There are referencing, spelling and grammatical errors on most pages.

4.9 to >0 pts

Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0%

Lack of supporting citations and/or errors in referencing. Poor proof reading. Inaccurate spelling, and grammar, or presentation. Too long or too short.

  / 10 pts

Buy Custom Assignment & Homework Solutions

Pay to NZ Native Writers | Cheap Cost & Plag Free

Criteria Weight % Grade A+ to A- Excellent performance: 100–80% Grade B+ to B- Good performance: 79–65% Grade C+ to C- Satisfactory: 64–50% Grade D to E Expectations not met: 49–0%
Description of significant leadership or management challenge 10 Significant leadership or management challenge clearly and comprehensively described. Good description of significant leadership or management challenge Significant leadership or management challenge briefly described. Challenge description inaccurate or lacking key information, and failing to focus on important aspects for leadership response
SWOT analysis of key issues 20 Thorough and insightful analysis of the key issues arising from the challenge Good clear analysis of the key issues arising from the challenge Analysis is adequate with some key issues identified from the challenge Analysis unclear or illogical, incomplete, does not reflect key issues apparent in the challenge
Analysis of health leadership and/or management implications 25 Insightful analysis of the implications for health leadership and/or management, showing awareness of priorities and risks Clear description of the implications for health leadership and/or management Adequate description of the implications for health leadership and/or management Analysis unclear or illogical, incomplete, does not reflect positioning at health management and leadership level
Management plan 25 Thorough and comprehensive plan showing insight in its structure, and management of contingencies and risks Logical and complete plan responding to the key issues and important implications Adequate plan responding to some leadership and management implications Incomplete or illogical plan, missing key issues and likely challenges – lacks substance
Scholarly writingDevelops scholarly argument, and logical structure for analysis. Well organised paragraphs. 10 Excellent quality of argument, presented with a clear and logical flow. Good clarity of writing, with a sound argument and logical flow. The argument is adequate but lacks some clarity or logical flow. Unclear argument that lacks logical flow.
PresentationSources are properly acknowledged. Accurate and consistent spelling, grammar, and referencing. Within word limit 10 Extensive range of literature, chosen from high quality sources, correctly represented, and cited, used effectively to support arguments made. No spelling, grammatical or referencing errors. Number of references supporting key points with some attempt to draw on published experiences in similar contexts. Some minor grammatical, spelling or referencing errors noted. Some references are used to support the key points. There are referencing, spelling and grammatical errors on most pages. Lack of supporting citations and/or errors in referencing. Poor proof reading, inaccurate spelling, and grammar. Poor presentation. Too long or too short.

I am a government nursing officer in Sri Lanka, work in teaching hospital Kandy in Sri Lanka.  I am not sure what the best challenge would be to select for this assignment. However, I know that nursing burnout and staff shortages are very common challenges in this field. Could you please help me choose the most suitable option for this assignment?

This is Professor conformation for topic selection:

you have the option to draw upon your experiences and workplaces from either other locations or from New Zealand. You can use a generic source to inform your plan or one specifically related to your previous experience in your country.

  • Include more than 20 references for this assignment.
  • There is no need to more information about leadership or leadership theories discuss briefly, as these were already discussed in my previous assignment.
  • A table of contents is also not required.
  • Given more information about high point allocate criteria
  • Use high-quality scholarly references, especially journal, articles and research papers (avoid use website)

Referencing and Presentation
Use APA (American Psychological Association) referencing and formatting. For support with APA 7th
Style considerations
· Fonts: Arial, Times New Roman, Calibri or Verdana only.
· Font size: 12.
· 1.5 or double line spacing
· 2.5 cm margin all round

Extra information of lecture conversation in discussion board

  1. Start your introduction early – have a clear idea of what it will look like when you begin writing.
  2. Don’t finalise it until the end – your introduction should be refined after you’ve written the full piece.
  3. Ensure synergy – the introduction and conclusion must connect, reflecting the same aims and expected outcomes.
  4. Full circle structure – your conclusion should bring the reader back to the points you set up in the introduction.

(especially for your SWOT analysis and planning) are:

  1. Goals need to be SMART
    • Specific: Clear and focused, not vague.
    • Measurable: You should be able to assess progress or success.
    • Achievable: Realistic given resources and context.
    • Realistic: Practical, not overly ambitious.
    • Time-bound: Linked to a clear timeframe or deadline.
  2. Apply this to your SWOT analysis – when you identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, make sure the goals you set in response are SMART.

3.In your plan – you’ll likely need to explicitly show how the goals you create align with these SMART principles.

In quest for a professional assignment help?

Flexible rates compatible with everyone’s budget

Get Help By Expert

Having trouble with your assignment on health leadership? You can get help from New Zealand Assignment Help! We provide professional advice and excellent case study help that is customised to meet your needs. Whether it's scholarly research, management plans, or SWOT analysis, our team guarantees excellent grades and stress-free writing. Contact us right now to confidently ace your assignment!

Answer

UP TO 15 % DISCOUNT

Get Your Assignment Completed At Lower Prices

Plagiarism Free Solutions
100% Original Work
24*7 Online Assistance
Native PhD Experts
Hire a Writer Now

Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now! Download Our App Now!