University | Victoria University of Wellington (VUW) |
Subject | Health Leadership and management |
Health Leadership and management – Case review and management plan
Assignment Name: Case review and management plan
Length: 2500-word limit
Weighting: This assignment is worth 50% of your final grade.
In this assignment you will undertake a case review of a leadership or management challenge in your own workplace or in the health sector. CHOOSE ONE of the options below
Option 1. A health leadership or management challenge in your own workplace or in the health sector.
OR Option 2. A health leadership and management challenge from the list below:
- addressing staff shortages
- promoting health equity
- maintaining cybersecurity
- managing burnout
- maintaining quality and safety
Task
-
Undertake a SWOT analysis of the factors contributing to your chosen challenge
-
Analyse the SWOT for leadership and management implications
-
Develop a plan to:
a. manage the threats and weaknesses
b. consider the financial and budgeting consequences
c. address the human resource implications.
Throughout your assignment you will demonstrate your scholarly approach synthesising literature to provide evidence to underpin your argument. This assignment addresses course learning objectives: 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Stuck! Do not Know Assessment Answers?
Hire NZ Native Experts 24/7.
Assignment 2 Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Points | ||||
Description of significant leadership or management challenge
Criterion long description 10%
|
10 to >7.9 pts
Excellent performance 100% – 80% Significant Leadership or management challenge clearly and comprehensively described. |
7.9 to >6.4 pts
Good Performance 79-65% Good description of significant leadership or management challenge |
6.4 to >4.9 pts
Satisfactory performance 64 – 50% Significant leadership or management challenge briefly described |
4.9 to >0 pts
Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0% Challenge description inaccurate or lacking key information, and failing to focus on important aspects for leadership response |
/ 10 pts | |
SWOT analysis of key issues
Criterion long description 20%
|
20 to >15.9 pts
Excellent performance 100% – 80% Thorough and insightful analysis of the key issues arising from the challenge |
15.9 to >13 pts
Good Performance 79-65% Good clear analysis of key issues arising from the challenge |
13 to >9.9 pts
Satisfactory Performance 64-50% Analysis is adequate with some key issues identified from the challenge |
9.9 to >0 pts
Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0% Analysis unclear or illogical, incomplete, does not reflect key issues apparent in the challenge |
/ 20 pts | |
Analysis of leadership and/or management implications
Criterion long description 25%
|
25 to >19.9 pts
Excellent Performance 100% – 80% Insightful analysis of the implications for leaders and/or managers, showing awareness of priorities and risks |
19.9 to >16 pts
Good Performance 79-65% Clear description of the implications for leadership and/or management |
16 to >12.4 pts
Satisfactory Performance 64-50% Adequate description of the implications for health leadership and/or management |
12.4 to >0 pts
Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0% Analysis unclear or illogical, incomplete, does not reflect positioning at management and leadership level |
/ 25 pts | |
Management plan
Criterion long description 25%
|
25 to >19.9 pts
Excellent Performance 100% – 80% Thorough and comprehensive plan showing insight in its structure, management of contingencies and risks |
19.9 to >16 pts
Good Performance 79-65% Logical and complete plan responding to the key issues and important implications |
16 to >12.4 pts
Satisfactory Performance 64-50% Adequate plan responding to some leadership and management implications |
12.4 to >0 pts
Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0% Incomplete or illogical plan, missing key issues and likely challenges – lacks substance |
/ 25 pts | |
Scholarly writing – Develops scholarly argument, and logical structure for analysis. Well organised paragraphs.
Criterion long description 10%
|
10 to >7.9 pts
Excellent Performance 100% – 80% Excellent quality of argument, presented with a clear logical flow. |
7.9 to >6.4 pts
Good Performance 79-65% Good clarity of writing with a sound argument and logical flow. |
6.4 to >4.9 pts
Satisfactory Performance 64-50% The argument is adequate but lacks some clarity or logical flow |
4.9 to >0 pts
Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0% Unclear argument that lacks logical flow. |
/ 10 pts | |
Presentation – Sources are properly acknowledged. Accurate and consistent spelling, grammar, and referencing. Within word limit.
Criterion long description 10%
|
10 to >7.9 pts
Excellent Performance 100% – 80% Extensive range of literature, chosen from high quality sources, correctly represented, and cited, used effectively to support arguments made. No spelling, grammatical or referencing errors. |
7.9 to >6.4 pts
Good Performance 79-65% Number of references covering key points with some attempt to draw on published experiences in similar contexts. Some minor grammatical, spelling or referencing errors noted. |
6.4 to >4.9 pts
Satisfactory Performance 64-50% Some references are used to support the key points. There are referencing, spelling and grammatical errors on most pages. |
4.9 to >0 pts
Fails to meet expectations 49% – 0% Lack of supporting citations and/or errors in referencing. Poor proof reading. Inaccurate spelling, and grammar, or presentation. Too long or too short. |
/ 10 pts |
Buy Custom Assignment & Homework Solutions
Pay to NZ Native Writers | Cheap Cost & Plag Free
Criteria | Weight % | Grade A+ to A- Excellent performance: 100–80% | Grade B+ to B- Good performance: 79–65% | Grade C+ to C- Satisfactory: 64–50% | Grade D to E Expectations not met: 49–0% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description of significant leadership or management challenge | 10 | Significant leadership or management challenge clearly and comprehensively described. | Good description of significant leadership or management challenge | Significant leadership or management challenge briefly described. | Challenge description inaccurate or lacking key information, and failing to focus on important aspects for leadership response |
SWOT analysis of key issues | 20 | Thorough and insightful analysis of the key issues arising from the challenge | Good clear analysis of the key issues arising from the challenge | Analysis is adequate with some key issues identified from the challenge | Analysis unclear or illogical, incomplete, does not reflect key issues apparent in the challenge |
Analysis of health leadership and/or management implications | 25 | Insightful analysis of the implications for health leadership and/or management, showing awareness of priorities and risks | Clear description of the implications for health leadership and/or management | Adequate description of the implications for health leadership and/or management | Analysis unclear or illogical, incomplete, does not reflect positioning at health management and leadership level |
Management plan | 25 | Thorough and comprehensive plan showing insight in its structure, and management of contingencies and risks | Logical and complete plan responding to the key issues and important implications | Adequate plan responding to some leadership and management implications | Incomplete or illogical plan, missing key issues and likely challenges – lacks substance |
Scholarly writingDevelops scholarly argument, and logical structure for analysis. Well organised paragraphs. | 10 | Excellent quality of argument, presented with a clear and logical flow. | Good clarity of writing, with a sound argument and logical flow. | The argument is adequate but lacks some clarity or logical flow. | Unclear argument that lacks logical flow. |
PresentationSources are properly acknowledged. Accurate and consistent spelling, grammar, and referencing. Within word limit | 10 | Extensive range of literature, chosen from high quality sources, correctly represented, and cited, used effectively to support arguments made. No spelling, grammatical or referencing errors. | Number of references supporting key points with some attempt to draw on published experiences in similar contexts. Some minor grammatical, spelling or referencing errors noted. | Some references are used to support the key points. There are referencing, spelling and grammatical errors on most pages. | Lack of supporting citations and/or errors in referencing. Poor proof reading, inaccurate spelling, and grammar. Poor presentation. Too long or too short. |
I am a government nursing officer in Sri Lanka, work in teaching hospital Kandy in Sri Lanka. I am not sure what the best challenge would be to select for this assignment. However, I know that nursing burnout and staff shortages are very common challenges in this field. Could you please help me choose the most suitable option for this assignment?
This is Professor conformation for topic selection:
you have the option to draw upon your experiences and workplaces from either other locations or from New Zealand. You can use a generic source to inform your plan or one specifically related to your previous experience in your country.
- Include more than 20 references for this assignment.
- There is no need to more information about leadership or leadership theories discuss briefly, as these were already discussed in my previous assignment.
- A table of contents is also not required.
- Given more information about high point allocate criteria
- Use high-quality scholarly references, especially journal, articles and research papers (avoid use website)
Referencing and Presentation
Use APA (American Psychological Association) referencing and formatting. For support with APA 7th
Style considerations
· Fonts: Arial, Times New Roman, Calibri or Verdana only.
· Font size: 12.
· 1.5 or double line spacing
· 2.5 cm margin all round
Extra information of lecture conversation in discussion board
- Start your introduction early – have a clear idea of what it will look like when you begin writing.
- Don’t finalise it until the end – your introduction should be refined after you’ve written the full piece.
- Ensure synergy – the introduction and conclusion must connect, reflecting the same aims and expected outcomes.
- Full circle structure – your conclusion should bring the reader back to the points you set up in the introduction.
(especially for your SWOT analysis and planning) are:
- Goals need to be SMART –
- Specific: Clear and focused, not vague.
- Measurable: You should be able to assess progress or success.
- Achievable: Realistic given resources and context.
- Realistic: Practical, not overly ambitious.
- Time-bound: Linked to a clear timeframe or deadline.
- Apply this to your SWOT analysis – when you identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, make sure the goals you set in response are SMART.
3.In your plan – you’ll likely need to explicitly show how the goals you create align with these SMART principles.
In quest for a professional assignment help?
Flexible rates compatible with everyone’s budget
Having trouble with your assignment on health leadership? You can get help from New Zealand Assignment Help! We provide professional advice and excellent case study help that is customised to meet your needs. Whether it's scholarly research, management plans, or SWOT analysis, our team guarantees excellent grades and stress-free writing. Contact us right now to confidently ace your assignment!
- HLTH 524 – Health Leadership and Management Assignment Two: A SWOT Analysis and Strategic Plan for Addressing Health Leadership and Management Challenges
- Consumer Marketing Research Report Assignment : Understanding Consumer Responses to Influencer Marketing Through a Literature Review and Research Proposal
- BN5.001 Inquiry for Nursing Assignment: Exploring Evidence-Based Practice, Professional Nursing Roles, and Interpersonal Communication Skills at the Novice Level
- HLTH521 Research Methods Assignment: Factors Influencing Health Service Use and Quality of Life Among Young Adults Working in the Building Industry
- Safe and Professional Practice Assignment 1 : Facilitating Forgiveness and Healing for Trauma Survivors through Faith and Wholeness
- Population Health Assignment Essay: Exploring the Intersections of Culture, Structure, and Health Equity
- MGMT316 Decision modelling for managers Assignment 1 : Forecasting and Analysis of Electronic Card Transactions in New Zealand for Strategic Investment
- BUSS509 Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability Assignment 1 Part 2: A Reflective Essay on Ethical Analysis and Personal Learning
- BUSS509 Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability Assignment 1: Ethical Analysis of Contemporary Dilemmas in Animal Testing, Self-Driving Cars, and Gene Editing
- Legal and Sociological Definitions of Crime Assignment : Contrasting Tappan’s Black Letter Law and Becker’s Deviance Theory