Avail 15% off on First assignment order NAH_FIRST_15%

Logo
University Yoobee College of Creative Innovation
Subject CAI402 Foundation of Machine Learning

Programme – NZ2860 New Zealand Certificate in Study and Employment Pathways Version 2 (Level 4, 60 Credits)

CourseCAI402 Foundation of Machine Learning (15 Credits)

CAI402  Assessment Group Presentation 

Weighting within the course:  100%

Objective

This course aims to enable ākonga to build on knowledge and skills in machine learning, collaboration, and fundamental programming concepts.

This assessment evaluates your ability to research, select and summarise key concepts in machine learning and automation using credible sources, and to present your findings clearly as a team.

Learning Outcomes (LOs) covered 

LO1 Research and summarise key concepts of machine learning and automation using information from credible sources.

Graduate Profile Outcomes (GPOs) covered

GPO1  Locate, select and analyse relevant information from a variety of sources, and apply this information by working independently and collaboratively, on context-relevant tasks and problems

GPO2 Construct a well-reasoned and researched argument relevant to their chosen field(s) and communicate it, using appropriate modes and media.

Assessment Matrix

Learning Outcome  Task Component Mapped GPOs Weighting (%)
LO1: Research and summarise key concepts of machine learning and automation using information from credible sources 1. Research and Understanding of Key Concepts GPO1, GPO2 30%
2. Application to Real World Industries GPO1, GPO2 30%
3. Reflective Summary on Research GPO1 20%
4. Credible Sources, Referencing and Critical Evaluation GPO1 15%
Presentation Structure and Visual Aids GPO2 5%
Total 100%

Grading

The final grade will be determined by the score achieved in this assessment based on the following table.  In order to meet the requirements of this course, ākonga | learners must achieve a minimum grade of 50% for all assessments. All assessments must be passed independently; marks are not aggregated or averaged across assessments. Ākonga | learners are permitted one attempt per assessment task.

If an ākonga | learner does not achieve a passing grade on the first attempt, they may be provided with one opportunity to re-sit. To be eligible to re-sit a grade between 40 – 49% on the first attempt is required. 50% is the maximum grade awarded for a re-sit.

Please note:

Failure to achieve a passing result after the re-sit may result in non-completion of the course and you may need to re-enrol in the course to progress in the programme of study.

Grade   Range Pass/Fail
A   Meet all course requirements, range (80+) Pass
B Meet all course requirements, range (65-79%) Pass
C   Meet all course requirements, range (50-64%) Pass
D Did not meet all course requirements, range (40-49%) Fail
E Did not meet all course requirements, mark range (0-39%) Fail

Assessment Instructions

  • This assessment is an open-book activity, you can use your own course and review notes as well as offline or online resources, such as textbooks or online journals.
  • You can always ask your tutor if you need further explanation about forming a group or if the instructions are unclear.
  • Your work should not be plagiarised. Plagiarism includes copying material without acknowledging it, copying from another student, getting another person to help you with your assessment, using material from commercial essays or assignment services, or using AI to create the answers.
  • The purpose of this assessment is to assess your knowledge. In the event Yoobee suspects collusion, this will be addressed. For more information on plagiarism, please refer to the Student Handbook.
  • Marks and feedback will be returned within 15 days of the submission date.
  • By completing and submitting an assessment you are authenticating that the work is original and does not violate plagiarism or copyright law. Authenticity is checked where any breaches of academic integrity are suspected. Please refer to the Student Handbook for further information

Submission Instructions

Please submit the following to your LMS (Learning Management System) by the due date:

  • Group Presentation
    o Video presentation (.mp4 format), 10-12 minutes in length for groups of 2 or 15-18 minutes in length for groups of 3.
    o    Copy of the presentation slides in PDF or .pptx format

Assessment Tasks Completion Timeline

Week What needs to be done   What needs to be submitted  
Week 1 Assessment released on LMS.

Form groups of 2-3, assign roles and responsibilities, and begin research.

—-
Week 2 Continue research, draft slides ——–
Week 3 Complete reflective summary and record audio narration.

Format referencing in APA style, and ensure all tasks are addressed.

———–
Week 4   Finalise and submit assessment. Group presentation (.mp4 format) plus copy of presentation slides (.PDF or .pptx format) submitted on the LMS

Score Better in CAI402 Machine Learning Assessment Short Description:

Hire NZ Native Experts 24/7.

Task Description:

Form a group of 2 or 3 to prepare and deliver a presentation exploring machine learning and automation in real life. Each group member must participate equally in the research, and present for at least 5 minutes.

Presentation Structure and Requirements

Your presentation should be delivered showing good presentation principles, including:

  • A Title Slide and Introduction:
    Your presentation must start with an introduction which includes:
    o A presentation title, the names and student IDs of all group members, the course name, and submission date.
    o A brief outline of what the presentation will cover.
  • Clear speaking, with confident and engaging delivery
  • Equal participation for all team members (at least 5 minutes of presentation time each)
  • Presentation Structure and Visual Aids:
    o Logical flow of content
    o Clear and uncluttered slides
    o Use of appropriate and relevant visuals (e.g. charts, diagrams etc.) which
    add value to the subject you are discussing.        

Presentation Tasks

1. Research and Understanding of Key Concepts:

i. Explain in your own words what machine learning is.
ii. Compare supervised and unsupervised learning and provide examples of each.
iii. Explain what automation means in this context and how Python can be used to automate tasks relevant to intelligent systems.

2. Application to Real World Industries:

Choose at least two distinct real-world sectors such as healthcare, transport, agriculture, retail, finance, education etc. For each sector, include:

  • A description of a specific problem or issue addressed by machine learning and/or AI automation.
  • The type and likely source of data, whether it would be labelled or unlabelled.
  • An explanation of the machine learning task and why it is appropriate for this industry and problem or issue.
  • Explain the likely benefits, limitations and risks in using machine learning and automation in these contexts. Give at least one benefit and one limitation or risk (for example bias, data quality, maintenance or privacy)
  • Supporting evidence with at least one cited source for the information and for any datasets mentioned.

3. Reflective summary on research:

  • Explain how your group searched for, evaluated and selected information to use for the presentation.
  • Describe at least one challenge your group faced in collaborating or communicating to research and create the presentation.
  • Explain how you overcame the challenge(s) described.

4. Use of Credible Sources and Referencing:

  • Use at least three credible sources to research your topic.
  • Evaluate credibility using CARS or CRAAP, including any datasets you use. Summarise key credibility reasons in your notes or slides.
  • Use APA 7 in-slide citations for any facts, figures or images that are not common knowledge.
  • Include a final APA 7 reference list as a last slide in the presentation.

CAI402  Assessment Marking Rubrics

Task Weighti ng A

(80-100%)

B

(65-79%)

C

(50-64%)

D

(40-49%)

E

(0-39%)

1. Research and Understan ding of Key Concepts

(LO1)

30% Accurate, clear explanation s in plain language. Correct

explanation

of supervised and unsupervise

d           with

relevant examples. Automation defined appropriatel

y  and

Python’s role explained clearly.

Mostly accurate with minor    gaps. Examples appropriate but under‑develo ped.      Small omissions or imprecision in automation or Python explanation. Basic and

partly accurate coverage. Examples are generic or unclear. Difference s between learning types not well explained.

Major

inaccuraci

es  or omissions across concepts. Examples misleading or poorly chosen.

Very limited understandi

ng.        Key

definitions

missing or incorrect.

2. Applicatio n to Realworld

Industries

(LO1)

30% Two          or

more sectors discussed. For each, a specific, well-scoped

problem; data type and likely source

clearly stated with labelled or unlabelled

status; ML task correctly

identified and convincingl

y justified for the

context; benefits and limitations/ri

sks         are

Two sectors discussed. All elements present with minor gaps in specificity or depth. ML task      is

appropriate but

justification is brief. Benefits

and limitations or risks             mostly relevant. Evidence provided             for each sector, though one citation or dataset attribution may be light.

Two

sectors mentioned

but treatment is uneven: one             or

more

elements

thin       or generic in each sector. ML task identified with limited or

unclear

justificatio

n. Benefits and

limitations or risks are surfacelevel.

Evidence present

Only one sector, or multiple required elements

missing in one or

both sectors. ML task is mismatche

d to the problem or largely unjustified. Benefits and

limitations

or risks are vague   or off-point. Little or no sectorspecific evidence; datasets not cited.

Application

s           are absent or inaccurate. Problems,

data      and task      are incorrect or missing.

Claims are unsupporte

d;            no

credible sources or dataset citations.

concrete and

balanced;

all significant claims supported with at least one source per           sector and   any

datasets explicitly cited.

but minimal or not clearly tied           to claims.
3. Reflective summary on research (LO1) 20% Clear account of search, selection and synthesis decisions.

Shows how

collaboratio n improved clarity and accuracy. Specific challenge explained with a clear link to better evidence or explanation.

Covers

search and selection with minor gaps.

Collaboration described generally. Challenge linked partially           to improvement.

Basic description of process. Limited detail on collaborati

on       or learning. Weak link

to

improvem ent.

Minimal reflection with     little evidence of process

or

improvem ent.

Unclear

link         to

LO1.

No meaningful reflection or link to LO1.
4. Credible

Sources,

Referencing          and

Critical

Evaluation

(LO1)

15% Three or more

credible sources. Correct in‑slide citations and

complete

APA          7

reference

list. Explicit, thoughtful

application of CARS or CRAAP to

justify credibility, including datasets.

At least three credible sources. APA mostly correct with     minor issues. Credibility considered

but      not consistently.

Three sources with

several APA

errors. Credibility discussion

brief    or generic.

Fewer than three credible sources or

significant

APA errors.

Weak     or

missing

credibility evaluation.

Citations or reference

list missing, or sources not credible.

Presentation

Structure,

Visual Aids and Time

Management

5% Clear,

logical progression signposted from introduction

to conclusion. Slides concise and uncluttered with consistent formatting. Visuals are relevant, correctly labelled and interpreted

in       speech,

clearly

strengtheni

ng        key points. Finishes within    the allotted time without rushing.

Generally logical structure with minor ordering or signposting issues. A few slides slightly text-heavy. Visuals mostly relevant and labelled, with minor gaps in explanation. Completes within the allotted time with minor pacing issues. Structure is uneven in places. Several slides cluttered or inconsiste ntly formatted. Visuals sometimes generic or decorative and only partly explained. Small overrun or underrun of up to 1 minute. Disorganis ed flow

that

makes ideas hard to follow. Frequent text-heavy slides. Visuals distract or are poorly labelled,

with little integration into the talk.

Overrun or underrun of 1-2 minutes.

No coherent structure. Slides are cluttered or missing key information. Visuals absent, misleading, or not explained. Significant overrun or underrun of more than

2 minutes.

Get Expert Help for Your CAI402 Presentation

Struggling with machine learning concepts, real-world applications, or APA referencing? Get expert support for your CAI402 group presentation today.

Get Help By Expert

Many students find the CAI402 Foundation of Machine Learning group presentation challenging due to research depth, real-world applications, and strict referencing rules. Explaining supervised vs unsupervised learning, automation, and Python clearly in a team presentation can be stressful. There is no need to worry—NZ Assignment Help provides expert guidance for CAI402 presentations, aligned with Yoobee assessment criteria.You can also review our sample presentations to understand structure, visuals, and academic quality. Order today to get 100% human-written, plagiarism-free support, tailored for your group presentation needs.

Answer

UP TO 15 % DISCOUNT

Get Your Assignment Completed At Lower Prices

Plagiarism Free Solutions
100% Original Work
24*7 Online Assistance
Native PhD Experts
Hire a Writer Now

Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now! Download Our App Now!