Avail 15% off on First assignment order NAH_FIRST_15%

Logo
University Massey University (MU)
Subject Safe and Professional Practice

ASSIGNMENT ONE

Title: Safe and professional practice (50%, 2,500 words)

Task:

Critically analyse the common challenges encountered by trauma survivors when considering forgiveness in your field. Evaluate your role as a facilitator in ensuring their safety and supporting their healing.

Key learning intentions (LI):

LI 2. Accurately identify safe practice principles for responding to people who have experienced interpersonal trauma

LI 3. Demonstrate an ability to engage critically and accurately with relevant evidence-based research

LI 5. Critically engage with the Biblical exhortation to love and forgive one another, to restore spiritual (Wairua) wellbeing

Description

Step one: Analyse common challenges in the forgiveness process

  • Provide background on your practice and describe prevalent forms of trauma in your workplace or community.
  • Define and critically discuss forgiveness, including Biblical perspectives: Explore the tension and dilemma surrounding love and forgiveness, particularly for survivors dealing with unfixable suffering, brokenness and injustice. Examine the challenges trauma survivors encounter in their forgiveness process including premature pressure from others to forgive.
  • Apply the ‘Te Whare Tapa Whā’ model to identify the survivor’s challenges across emotional, mental, physical and spiritual dimensions.

Step two: Evaluating your role as a facilitator

  • Discuss the process of forgiveness and the forgiveness journey using Phil Halstead’s research.
  • Discuss your roles as a facilitator: Based on Halstead’s work, analyse safe practice principles to ensure survivors’ emotional, mental, physical and spiritual safety throughout their healing and forgiveness journey.

Additional Guidelines:

  • This is a formal academic and professional assignment requiring critical engagement with peer-reviewed research.
  • Reference at least 6–8 academic sources to strengthen your discussion.
  • Utilise the weekly reading lists and online discussion forums to expand your analysis.
  • Ensure all references follow APA 7th formatting standards.

Stuck! Do not Know Assessment Answers?

Hire NZ Native Experts 24/7.

Grading rubric

The essay assignment will be marked according to the following criteria: Pay close attention to the precise wordings in each box, as markers will select grades in accordance with these wordings.

Criteria A (Excellent) B (Good) C (Satisfactory) D (Needs Improvement)
1) Analysis of Challenges in Trauma Survivors’ Forgiveness Process Provides a comprehensive and insightful analysis of key challenges, demonstrating strong contextual understanding. Provides a thoughtful discussion of challenges with some relevant contextual understanding. Describes challenges adequately. Description or contextual connections may be superficial or uneven. Limited or inaccurate discussion with unclear or weak analysis.
2) Biblical Exhortation on Love & Forgiveness Critically engages with biblical principles, analysing tensions between love, forgiveness, and trauma recovery with depth and clarity. Demonstrates thoughtful engagement with biblical principles but lacks critical analysis of tensions in some areas. Shows adequate understanding of biblical themes but may be superficial or uneven. Limited engagement with biblical themes, needing more depth and critical insight.
3) Safe Practice Principles for Forgiveness Process and Journey Critically applies safe practice principles with comprehensive understanding of both forgiveness processes and the journey of forgiveness. Shows a clear and accurate understanding of safe practice principles related to forgiveness process and journey. Demonstrates an adequate awareness of safe practice principles, forgiveness processes and its journey but may be superficial or uneven. Limited understanding of safe practice principles, with little to no discussion on both/either forgiveness processes and/or the journey of forgiveness.
4) Engagement with Evidence-Based Research Critically evaluates high-quality, relevant academic literature, integrating strong supporting evidence throughout. Engages appropriately with relevant research and makes connections across literature and into practice. References relevant studies, some may be non-academic sources. Analytical depth may be superficial or uneven. Minimal or inaccurate use of evidence-based research.

Buy Custom Assignment & Homework Solutions

Pay to NZ Native Writers | Cheap Cost & Plag Free

Get Help By Expert

Do you want a pro to help with college paper? At NZ Assignment Help, we offer the best advice on tricky issues such as recovery and forgiveness of trauma. We can provide you with assistance in research, structure and referencing. Essay Help is here and just one click away Deal!

Answer

UP TO 15 % DISCOUNT

Get Your Assignment Completed At Lower Prices

Plagiarism Free Solutions
100% Original Work
24*7 Online Assistance
Native PhD Experts
Hire a Writer Now

Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now! Download Our App Now!