Avail 15% off on First assignment order NAH_FIRST_15%

Logo
University New Zealand Skills and Education College (NZSE)
Subject GCHG704 Health Practices and Policies in Aotearoa New Zealand

GCHG704 Assignment 1

Course Code & Title: GCHG704: Health Practices and Policies in Aotearoa New Zealand
Assessment Title: Assignment 1 Assessment Type: Essay
Level: 7 Course Credits: 15
Due date: Week 5, 1 June 2026
Overall Weighting: 30%
Total marks available: 100

Assessment Information

  • This is an individual open book written assessment. The assessment is worth 25% of your total assessment weighting of the entire course
  • You must complete the Student Declaration and attestation on Canvas LMS
  • Resources and/or equipment which may be used for this activity include NZSE issued material and your own course notes
  • You must submit your completed assessment to Canvas LMS
  • A maximum of 15% of the content may be quoted or paraphrased from other sources provided you acknowledge and cite the original source of material you use
  • Use APA 7th edition referencing for all quoted or paraphrased material
  • All cases of plagiarism and/or cheating will be investigated and dealt with according to A08: Misconduct in Assessment Policy
  • Your assessment will be marked on Canvas, and your assessment result will be provided on Canvas too
  • You must ensure you are familiar with NZSE’s academic policies regarding assessments. These policies and regulations can be found on your Course Outline on Canvas LMS.
  • If you have any disabilities for writing, please discuss with your lecturer options for alternative submission methods.

Submission Instructions 

You are required to ensure you have carried out the following before submitting your assessment:

  • Naming convention of submitted file/s must be adhered to: CourseCode_ AssessmentNumber_ AssessmentType_StudentID
    For example, “GCHG704_A1_Essay_850000XXXX”
  • All written answers are in your own words
  • Proofread and spell check the assessment work carefully
  • DO NOT email your document/s to your tutor; it must be uploaded to the Canvas LMS Check that all evidence required has been uploaded to the link provided on Canvas LMS.

Assessment Regulations

Extensions

When learners cannot complete an assessment because of exceptional circumstances they will be provided an extension.  If a learner needs an extension, they must apply to their lecturer in writing by email at least 3 days prior to the assessment submission due date.  If the learner fails to submit by this time, they will fail the assessment.

Learners are encouraged to submit by the assessment due date. However, learners who are regularly late submitting their assessments will be offered support. Formative assessments should support learners to be able to submit on time.

Late assessments will incur a penalty of 5% per day (unless an extension is granted before the due date).  Any assessment received later than 5 working days after the due date will be marked to a maximum of 50% with no re-submission or re-submit allowed.

Resubmission

There are no resubmissions in this course.

All courses have a 50% pass grade and all assessments within a course must be the learner’s best attempt and passed with a 50% grade to achieve a successful outcome for that course.

Appeals will be processed according to NZSEG A10 Appeals Policy.

Authenticity and Plagiarism

The use of Canvas LMS allows the use of the authenticity checking Turnitin software to be used as part of the submission process for written assessments where plagiarism may be a concern.

Current student Policies allow for the use of plagiarism software or other means to confirm an assessment is a learner’s own work. Assessments may be retained on a plagiarism detection database for ongoing comparison with other assessments submitted.

NZSE have an AI policy [Academic Policy A20 – Generative AI Policy] in place that encourages the use of AI tools by learners to supplement their studies but prohibits its use for assessments (unless otherwise directed) to discourage plagiarism and to maintain academic integrity.

If an assessor has doubts over the authenticity of assessment answers, the learner may be requested to demonstrate understanding in front of the assessor.

Other regulations

This programme will comply with NZSE Quality Management System and Policies. Academic policies have been hyperlinked from within the Student Handbook.

Professionalism

Throughout this programme, lecturers will emphasise the importance of professionalism in the health sector. Learners are expected to demonstrate professionalism within the class settings and will be assessed on their abilities to apply such professionalism in their written work presented as part of their summative assessments.

Professionalism may include but is not limited to cultural responsibility, ethical behaviour, morality, honesty, integrity, empathy, and confidentiality.

These traits, skills and attributes are expected of health graduates.

Academic Integrity

Throughout this programme, learners are applying academic skills such as critical thinking, utilising multiple peer-reviewed journal articles, writing evidence-informed inferences, constructing and evidencing specific academic arguments, and using critical reasoning.

Academic Writing

Refer to the information provided on Canvas LMS during the Academic Writing workshop regarding critical analysis, critical evaluation, referencing, etc.

Assessment Purpose

The purpose of this assessment is to assess the learner’s ability to analyse ethical, legal and professional standards and guidelines to establish their relevance and impact on hauora for New Zealand’s diverse communities.

Graduate Profile Outcomes

This course is mapped to the following GPO:

GPO 1: Critically evaluate advanced concepts, frameworks, policies, and culturally responsive strategies in mental health, community health, and addiction services to promote holistic, equitable, and socially just health outcomes for diverse populations in Aotearoa New Zealand.
GPO 2: Critically evaluate legal standards, ethical approaches, and culturally reflective practices of mental health, community health and addiction challenges, for the enhancement of hauora, harm reduction, and equitable health outcomes for indigenous and vulnerable communities in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Learning Outcomes

When you successfully complete this course, you will be able to:

LO 1: Evaluate ethical guidelines and approaches, examining their relevance and impact on hauora for Aotearoa New Zealand’s diverse population. (4 credits)
LO 1: Critically examine healthcare strategies and policies contributing to equitable health outcomes within Aotearoa New Zealand. (5 credits)
LO 3: Critically examine healthcare strategies and policies contributing to equitable health outcomes within Aotearoa New Zealand. (6 credits)

Assessment Details 

You are to write an essay in which you evaluate the ethical guidelines and approaches that apply in health practice in Aotearoa New Zealand.  Examine their relevance and impact on the holistic wellbeing (hauora) of Aotearoa New Zealand’s diverse population, with particular attention to cultural responsiveness and equity for marginalised people. Read all tasks before you start your essay.

Structure of the essay (as a guide only)

  1. Introduction including hook, background information and proposition statement (+- 200 words) [15 marks]
  2. Evaluation (+/- 900 words) [45 marks]
  3. Discussion of above findings (+/- 500 words) [30 marks]
  4. Academic Writing and Referencing [10 marks] A total of approximately 1,600 words.

Assessment Tasks

Introduction (+/- 200 words) [15 marks]

  • Outline the scope and purpose of your assignment.
  • Provide an overview of the evaluation you plan to conduct in Task Two
  • Ensure your introduction includes a hook, background information, and proposition statement.

Evaluation (+/- 900 words) [45 marks]

You need to:

  1. Evaluate at least two ethical guidelines and two approaches, as apply in healthcare in Aotearoa New Zealand, using the four principles of ethics (beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice)
  2. Examine the relevance and impact of these two guidelines and two approaches on hauora for one of Aotearoa New Zealand’s diverse populations (i.e., Māori, Pasifika, or disabled.)

Discussion (+/- 500 words) [30 marks]

From your findings in Task Two,

Provide an in-depth discussion of how one ethical guideline and/or approach is clearly relevant and impactful on hauora for the same diverse population in Aotearoa New Zealand, chosen above. Support your discussion with evidences from your evaluation.

Explain on how you would apply this guideline and/or approach through professional conduct.

Academic Writing and APA referencing (min. of 5 sources) [10 marks]

Use at least 5 relevant sources (government or sector reports and peer-reviewed academic articles) and include in-text citations and referencing, using APA 7th edition style, to acknowledge all the sources of information you have used. Sources should be current (within the last 10 years), with emphasis on recent developments and contemporary evidence. Blog posts and non-academic websites are not acceptable as primary sources.

GCHG704: Marking Rubric

Learning outcomes

LO1: Evaluate ethical guidelines and approaches, examining their relevance and impact on hauora for Aotearoa New Zealand’s diverse population. (4 credits)

LO2: Critically analyse the legal and professional standards that regulate community health, mental health, and addiction services in Aotearoa New Zealand. (5 credits)

Task 1: Introduction (15 marks)

Excellent Good Satisfactory Adequate Inadequate Poor
A compelling hook to the

introduction which has set the stage for an in-depth essay and provides engaging detail of the evaluation and analysis, background information and a proposition statement.

A clear hook to the introduction which has set the stage for a good essay and provides engaging detail of the evaluation and analysis, background information and a proposition statement. An essay introduction which includes details of the evaluation and analysis including a satisfactory hook, background information and a proposition statement. This intro lacks some clarity. A sufficient introduction to the essay with an adequate hook, background information and proposition statement. An inadequate introduction to the essay including some irrelevant details, and lacking a hook, background information and/or proposition statement.

 

Little or no evidence or an introduction to the essay.
14 to 15 marks 10 to 13 marks 8 to 10 marks 5 to 7 marks 2 to 4 marks 0-1 marks

Task two Evaluation : (45 marks)

a) Evaluate at least two ethical guidelines and two approaches, as apply in healthcare in Aotearoa New Zealand, using the four principles of ethics (beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice)

b) Examine the relevance and impact of these two guidelines and two approaches on hauora for one of Aotearoa New Zealand’s diverse populations (i.e., Māori, Pasifika, or disabled.)

Excellent Good Satisfactory Adequate Inadequate Poor
An in-depth and insightful evaluation of two ethical guidelines and two approaches using the 4 principles of ethics, including all (11) of the following:

  •  strengths, limitations, relevance and impact
  • evidence, alternatives
  • value and/or appropriateness
  •  reasoned judgement
  • comparison with alternatives
  • determination of value (e.g., good/effective/appropriate). Demonstrates fluency and sophistication in writing style and structure.

An insightful examination of the relevance and impact of these two guidelines and two approaches on hauora for one of New Zealand’s [clearly identified] diverse populations (i.e., Māori, Pasifika, or disabled).

Throughout the details there is ample evidence of critical thinking and use of credible evidence from more than three peer reviewed sources.

A clear, logical evaluation of two ethical guidelines and two approaches

using the 4 principles of ethics, including 9 of the following:

  • strengths, limitations, relevance
  • and/or impact
  • evidence, alternatives
  • value and/or appropriateness
  •  reasoned judgement
  •  comparison with alternatives
  • determination of value (e.g., good/effective/appropriate).  A clear, coherent and detailed examination of the relevance and impact of these two guidelines and two approaches on hauora for one of New Zealand’s [clearly identified] diverse populations (i.e., Māori, Pasifika, or disabled).

There is good evidence of critical thinking, and use of    credible evidence from 3 peer reviewed sources.

A satisfactory evaluation of two ethical guidelines and two approaches using the 4 principles of ethics, including 7 of the following:

  • strengths, limitations, relevance and/or impact
  •  evidence, alternatives
  • value and/or appropriateness
  • reasoned judgement
  • comparison with alternatives
  • determination of value (e.g., good/effective/appropriate). An examination of the relevance and impact of these two guidelines and two approaches on hauora for New Zealand’s diverse populations (generalised, not specified).  There is satisfactory evidence of critical thinking, and use of    evidence from 3 academic sources.
A sufficient evaluation of two ethical guidelines and two approaches using the 4 principles of ethics, including 5 of the following:

  • strengths, limitations, relevance and/or impact
  •  evidence, alternatives
  •  value and/or appropriateness
  •  reasoned judgement
  •  comparison with alternatives
  • determination of value (e.g., good/effective/ appropriate). Limited examination of the relevance and impact of these guidelines and approaches on hauora for New Zealand’s diverse populations (nonspecified).
An insufficient evaluation of ethical guidelines and approaches. Inadequate examination of with minimum relevance OR impact of these guidelines and approaches on hauora for one of New Zealand’s diverse populations. Little or no evaluation of ethical guidelines and approaches.

Little or no examination of the relevance and/or impact of these guidelines and approaches on hauora for one of New Zealand’s diverse populations.

 

39 to 45 marks 31 to 38 marks 23 to 30 marks 15 to 22 marks 7 to 14 marks 0 to 6

marks

Task Three: Discussion (30 marks) 

Excellent Good Satisfactory Adequate Inadequate Poor
Provides an in-depth, coherent, and persuasive discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn clearly from the evaluation.

Demonstrates strong insight into why it is especially relevant and impactful

for the hauora of the chosen population. Integrates evidence effectively from Task 2 and extends the evaluation meaningfully. Explains professional application with excellent clarity. Demonstrates a strong understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct.

 

Provides a clear and well-developed discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn clearly from the evaluation. Demonstrates insight into why it is especially relevant and impactful for the hauora of the chosen population. Integrates evidence effectively from Task 2 and extends the evaluation well. Explains professional application with clarity. Demonstrates a good understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct.

 

Provides a general discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn from the evaluation. Demonstrates some insight into why it is especially relevant for the hauora of the chosen population. Explains professional application with some clarity. Demonstrates a basic understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct.

 

Provides an adequate discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn from the evaluation. Demonstrates sufficient insight into why it is especially relevant for the hauora of the chosen population. Explains professional application with limited clarity. Demonstrates a sufficient understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct.

 

Provides inadequate discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn from the evaluation. Demonstrates insufficient insight into why it is especially relevant for the hauora of the chosen population. Explains unclear professional application. Demonstrates

an insufficient understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct.

 

Little or no discussion nor arguments on the discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn from evaluation. Poor insight into why it is especially relevant for the Hauora of the chosen population. Little or no explanation about professional application. Little or poor

understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct.

26 to 30 marks 21 to 25 marks 15 to 20 marks 10 to 14 marks 5 to 9 marks 0 to 4 marks

APA Referencing (max. 10 marks)

Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent
Ten or more appropriate and relevant references, which have been included in both in-text citations and reference list in the correct APA 7th edition format.    Ten or more appropriate and relevant references, which have been included in both in-text citations and reference list in the correct APA 7th edition format.    Ten or more appropriate and relevant references, which

have been included in both in-

text citations and reference list in the correct APA 7th edition format.   

Ten or more appropriate and relevant references, which

have been included in both in-

text citations and reference list in the correct APA 7th edition format.   

Ten or more appropriate and relevant references,

which have been included

in both in-text citations and reference list in the correct APA 7th edition format.   

Ten or more appropriate and relevant references, which have been

included in both in-text citations and reference

list in the correct APA 7th edition format.   

9 to 10 marks 9 to 10 marks 9 to 10 marks 9 to 10 marks 9 to 10 marks 9 to 10 marks

Get a Human-Written Solution for GCHG704 Assignment 1 Today

Hire NZ Native Experts 24/7.

Get Help By Expert

Are you also facing difficulties with GCHG704 Health Practices and Policies in Aotearoa New Zealand Assignment 1? If yes, then this is common. Many students find it difficult to complete this assignment. Some do not have enough time, while others do not understand how to do it. But now there is no need to worry because NZ Assignment Help provides health studies assignment help according to your course requirements. For trust and clarity, you can also check our health assignment examples. So, without any delay, order your custom, plagiarism-free, and human-written solution before your deadline with our write my essay service.

Answer

UP TO 15 % DISCOUNT

Get Your Assignment Completed At Lower Prices

Plagiarism Free Solutions
100% Original Work
24*7 Online Assistance
Native PhD Experts
Hire a Writer Now

Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now! Download Our App Now!